2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-05684-5_24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Two Couplings of the Finite Volume Method and the Boundary Element Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This problem is the classical Laplace problem for the interior and exterior domain and one can see this as a benchmark problem to test new discrete systems, especially with adaptive mesh refinement techniques. In [17] the reader can find a comparison between the adaptive FVM-BEM approach of [16] and the adaptive cell-centered FVM-BEM with a conforming Morley interpolant in [15]. Therefore we compare the results of the coupling in this work, where we use the nonconforming Morley interpolant (noco) for the post processed finite volume solution, against the adaptive coupling given in [15], where we used a conforming Morley interpolant (co); i.e., a Morley element for diffusion problems.…”
Section: Mexican Hat Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem is the classical Laplace problem for the interior and exterior domain and one can see this as a benchmark problem to test new discrete systems, especially with adaptive mesh refinement techniques. In [17] the reader can find a comparison between the adaptive FVM-BEM approach of [16] and the adaptive cell-centered FVM-BEM with a conforming Morley interpolant in [15]. Therefore we compare the results of the coupling in this work, where we use the nonconforming Morley interpolant (noco) for the post processed finite volume solution, against the adaptive coupling given in [15], where we used a conforming Morley interpolant (co); i.e., a Morley element for diffusion problems.…”
Section: Mexican Hat Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%