2016
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2777690
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Portfolio Model of Quantitative Easing

Abstract: used (reproduced, used via the internet, etc.) for non-commercial purposes and provided that the source is mentioned. Their use for commercial purposes is only permitted with the prior express consent of the SNB. General information and data published without reference to a copyright may be used without mentioning the source. To the extent that the information and data clearly derive from outside sources, the users of such information and data are obliged to respect any existing copyrights and to obtain the ri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SNB's tools for monetary policy implementation during the period of March 2009 to January 2015, namely liquidity-providing asset purchases and foreign exchange interventions, also affected long-term interest rates through term and risk premiums (Christensen and Krogstrup 2016). The measures did, however, also succeed in affecting the 3-month Swiss franc Libor rate within its target band, and this variation is what we take advantage of in our empirical analysis.…”
Section: Swiss Monetary Policy Implementationmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The SNB's tools for monetary policy implementation during the period of March 2009 to January 2015, namely liquidity-providing asset purchases and foreign exchange interventions, also affected long-term interest rates through term and risk premiums (Christensen and Krogstrup 2016). The measures did, however, also succeed in affecting the 3-month Swiss franc Libor rate within its target band, and this variation is what we take advantage of in our empirical analysis.…”
Section: Swiss Monetary Policy Implementationmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…As noted by Bonner (2016, p. 2), within these rules, government securities hold a 0% risk weighting, leading to what is termed a 'regulatory effect' of choosing to hold these bonds (Andreasen et al 2015, p. 7). Indeed, the literature suggests that bank regulation, especially risk-based capital constraints, may weaken the effectiveness of non-standard monetary operations as banks ensure that they meet their capital requirements (Peek and Rosengren 1993, p. 36;1995, p. 23;Albertazzi et al 2016, p. 16 andChristensen andKrogstrup 2018, p. 20). Second, in an attempt to avoid negative deposit rates on excess reserves induced by the APP, banks may have managed their level of reserves and in particular, pushed on excess reserves like a 'hot potato' to other banks (Ryan and Whelan 2019, p. 36).…”
Section: Portfolio Rebalancing In Banks and Householdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both ∑ and ∑ increase owing to QE and so ∑ increases as well, as depicted in Figure 4. (Christensen and Krogstrup, 2016). This channel works if banks substitute their central bank reserves ( =2 ) in higher yielding assets such as risky government bonds ( =2 ), because these are more profitable.…”
Section: Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%