2017
DOI: 10.1109/tnsre.2016.2542064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Portable Sensory Augmentation Device for Balance Rehabilitation Using Fingertip Skin Stretch Feedback

Abstract: Neurological disorders are the leading causes of poor balance. Previous studies have shown that biofeedback can compensate for weak or missing sensory information in people with sensory deficits. These biofeedback inputs can be easily recognized and converted into proper information by the central nervous system (CNS), which integrates the appropriate sensorimotor information and stabilizes the human posture. In this study, we proposed a form of cutaneous feedback which stretches the fingertip pad with a rotat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can be interpreted as follows: FC had more distinct effects on the improvement of the subjects' performance compared to the other augmented sensory feedback conditions, i.e., NA, F, and C. Even though each of F and C may not effectively enhance the safety-related metrics, the combined sensory feedback FC synergistically enhanced the safety-related metrics. This result is consistent with the findings from Shull and Damian (2015); Pan and Hur (2016); Pan et al (2017) that skin is a good receptor; therefore, cutaneous stimulations have the great feasibilities to serve as an efficient augmented sensory feedback. Similarly, for gait and balance rehabilitation trainings, the feasibility to improve learning efficiency was attested by stimulating multiple skin locations so that the subjects can perceive different haptic stimuli more accurately (Jirattigalachote et al, 2011; Lurie et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This can be interpreted as follows: FC had more distinct effects on the improvement of the subjects' performance compared to the other augmented sensory feedback conditions, i.e., NA, F, and C. Even though each of F and C may not effectively enhance the safety-related metrics, the combined sensory feedback FC synergistically enhanced the safety-related metrics. This result is consistent with the findings from Shull and Damian (2015); Pan and Hur (2016); Pan et al (2017) that skin is a good receptor; therefore, cutaneous stimulations have the great feasibilities to serve as an efficient augmented sensory feedback. Similarly, for gait and balance rehabilitation trainings, the feasibility to improve learning efficiency was attested by stimulating multiple skin locations so that the subjects can perceive different haptic stimuli more accurately (Jirattigalachote et al, 2011; Lurie et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…A haptic lever is one of the most commonly-used interfaces providing a force feedback to attract the user toward the safer or the desired directions while driving a power-wheelchair (Crespo and Reinkensmeyer, 2008; Marchal-Crespo et al, 2010a; Yoon et al, 2017) or assisting target-pointing/hitting tasks (Powell and O'Malley, 2012; Fisher et al, 2015; Patton and Huang, 2016). Vibrators or skin-stretchers have also been used to provide tactile stimulations for postural sway improvement (Gopalai and Senanayake, 2011; Pan and Hur, 2016; Pan et al, 2017), trunk sway improvement (Davis et al, 2010; Lee et al, 2012), target acquisition and pointing (Bark et al, 2010; Hsieh et al, 2014; Kaul and Rohs, 2016), balance training (Spelmezan et al, 2009; Nanhoe-Mahabier et al, 2012), gait function learning (Shull et al, 2011; Sienko et al, 2013). Several devices have been developed to provide realistic three dimensional tactile sensation to the user, e.g., touching a flat surface, grasping a virtual object, and tipping a surface or an object (Chinello et al, 2012; Prattichizzo et al, 2013; Pacchierotti et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, upright standing involves the integration and transformation of various sensory inputs (e.g., vision, vestibular system, proprioception, touch) via a highly-coordinated central nervous system (CNS) into bodily information (e.g., position, velocity, and acceleration of body sway). Degradation in the sensory systems (e.g., vision 7, 9 proprioception 10-12 , vestibular system 8,13 , touch 3,14 ), muscular systems 15,16 and nervous systems 17,18 worsens balance of the upright standing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One widely-accepted idea is that human sensorimotor systems utilize the error feedbacks for motor adaptation 29 . Several studies have reported that amplifying the movement errors could enhance the rehabilitation outcomes, which is sometimes referred to as an error augmentation 13,30,31 . Although rehabilitation may include internal sources of adaptation such as motor imagery, these are not the focus of this study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation