Free Energy Principle in Human Postural Control System: Skin Stretch Feedback Reduces the Entropy

Abstract

Human upright standing involves an integration of multiple sensory inputs such as vision, vestibular and somatosensory systems. It has been known that sensory deficits worsen the standing balance. However, how the modulation of sensory information contributes to postural stabilization still remains an open question for researchers. The purpose of this work was to formulate the human standing postural control system in the framework of the free-energy principle, and to investigate the efficacy of the skin stretch feedback in enhancing the human standing balance. Previously, we have shown that sensory augmentation by skin stretch feedback at the fingertip could modulate the standing balance of the people with simulated sensory deficits. In this study, subjects underwent ten 30-second trials of quiet standing balance with and without skin stretch feedback. Visual and vestibular sensory deficits were simulated by having each subject close their eyes and tilt their head back. We found that sensory augmentation by velocity-based skin stretch feedback at the fingertip reduced the entropy of the standing postural sway of the people with simulated sensory deficits. This result aligns with the framework of the free energy principle which states that a self-organizing biological system at its equilibrium state tries to minimize its free energy either by updating the internal state or by correcting body movement with appropriate actions. The velocity-based skin stretch feedback at the fingertip may increase the signal-to-noise ratio of the sensory signals, which in turn enhances the accuracy of the internal states in the central nervous system. With more accurate internal states, the human postural control system can further adjust the standing posture to minimize the entropy, and thus the free energy.

Continuous Skin-Stretch Feedback for Rendering 3D Vector Information

“…It has the characteristics of low density and indentation thresholds, compared to FA-I and SA-I type mechanoreceptors on the hand [10]. Due to its nature of the less sensitive spatial resolution, relatively fewer haptic devices utilized the skin-stretch feedback to provide the tactile information to the hand [11]- [14]. Recently, we applied the skin-stretch feedback to the dorsum of a hand during the virtual object grasping task and demonstrated that the skin-stretch feedback could modulate the perceived size of an object [15].…”