2017
DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000003504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A population-based epidemiologic study of adult neuromuscular disease in the Republic of Ireland

Abstract: The PR of all adult NMD in RoI is relatively high when compared with other chronic neurologic disorders, although some figures may be an underestimate of the true prevalence. The data provide a framework for international comparison and service planning.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
64
2
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
5
64
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Because our study included patients from a tertiary neuromuscular clinic, a selection bias might have occurred. Nonetheless, the three most common etiologies for polyneuropathy (excluding CIDP) in our study were similar to those in a community setting, and the two most common etiologies for muscle disease were muscular dystrophy and inclusion body myositis, which is similar to an epidemiological study in the Republic of Ireland . The diagnosis of polyneuropathy was based on clinical grounds, and we did not use formal clinical or research criteria such as the England criteria for (distal symmetric) polyneuropathy and EFNS and Peripheral Nerve Society (PNS) criteria for CIDP to establish the diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Because our study included patients from a tertiary neuromuscular clinic, a selection bias might have occurred. Nonetheless, the three most common etiologies for polyneuropathy (excluding CIDP) in our study were similar to those in a community setting, and the two most common etiologies for muscle disease were muscular dystrophy and inclusion body myositis, which is similar to an epidemiological study in the Republic of Ireland . The diagnosis of polyneuropathy was based on clinical grounds, and we did not use formal clinical or research criteria such as the England criteria for (distal symmetric) polyneuropathy and EFNS and Peripheral Nerve Society (PNS) criteria for CIDP to establish the diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…In addition, not all studies included the full range of ages of patient with CIDP. One study excluding patients younger than 18 years observed a relatively highly prevalence rate (5.87 per 100,000 adults; 95% CI 5.06-6.68), that is probably explained by the increase of CIDP with age [36]. In conclusion, the use of different diagnostic criteria seems to affect the observed incidence and prevalence rates of CIDP but also differences in the use of other inclusion criteria seem to play a role.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…While we find that studies using the EFNS/PNS 2006 criteria obtain higher prevalence rates than studies using the AAN criteria, the difference between the 2 estimates is not significant (p = 0.11). One study described prevalence using the EFNS/PNS 2010 criteria (5.87 per 100,000) [36]. Overall, the prediction intervals were substantially wider, thereby reflecting the observed heterogeneity between studies.…”
Section: Incidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Myotonic dystrophy type 1 ( dystrophia myotonica, DM1, also called Steinert's disease) is an autosomal dominant multisystem disorder caused by unstable (CTG) n trinucleotide repeat expansion in the 3′ noncoding region of the dystrophia myotonica protein kinase ( DMPK ) gene on chromosome 19q13.3 . The prevalence of DM1 ranges from 0.5/100,000 in Taiwan to 1/550 in Northestern Quebec; the estimate for Europe ranges from 6.8/100,000 to 36.2/100,000 . Myotonia and muscle weakness are the main clinical presentations of DM1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%