2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.12.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Polymer-Free Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent Versus a Bare-Metal Stent for De Novo Femoropopliteal Lesions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
61
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our search identified 57 eligible RCTs from 69 articles enrolling a total of 9,362 patients comparing seven revascularization strategies (balloon angioplasty vs. bare metal stent vs. covered stent vs. paclitaxel eluting stent vs. other drug eluting stent vs. paclitaxel‐coated balloon vs. bypass surgery; Figure 1). 1,2,16‐82 Other drug eluting stents category included sirolimus/zotarolimus/everolimus eluting stent. Cochrane risk of bias is summarized in Figure S2a, b. Baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our search identified 57 eligible RCTs from 69 articles enrolling a total of 9,362 patients comparing seven revascularization strategies (balloon angioplasty vs. bare metal stent vs. covered stent vs. paclitaxel eluting stent vs. other drug eluting stent vs. paclitaxel‐coated balloon vs. bypass surgery; Figure 1). 1,2,16‐82 Other drug eluting stents category included sirolimus/zotarolimus/everolimus eluting stent. Cochrane risk of bias is summarized in Figure S2a, b. Baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 34 studies deemed eligible for quantitative synthesis, 30 studies were multicenter RCTs 18, ; the remaining 4 were single-center trials [55][56][57][58] (Table 1). Twenty-five studies [26][27][28][29][30][31]33,[35][36][37]39,40,[43][44][45][46]48,50,51,[53][54][55][56][57][58] employed a 1:1 randomization process and conducted an intention to treat analysis, and 2 studies 42,52 compared a paclitaxel device to 2 nonpaclitaxel intervention groups implementing 1:1:1 randomization process. A further 6 studies 18,32,38,41,47,49 employed a 2:1 randomization process, and a single study 34 employed a 3:1 randomization process, paclitaxel to control.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We chose Zilver PTX stent (Cook Medical) owing to its superior performance as the first generation drug-eluting stent in peripheral segments compared to conventional bare nitinol stents; however, Zilver PTX stent (Cook Medical) unfortunately failed to show durability superiority in subsequent reports. 5,6 Zeller et al 2 reported a 1-year clinical efficacy of Zilver PTX stent (Cook Medical) in use for in-stent restenosis; however, its efficacy over several years was uncertain. According to the reports, we speculated that it would be difficult to believe that Zilver PTX stent was a main factor for our case to keep patency over several years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%