2003
DOI: 10.1658/1100-9233(2003)014[0333:apfatt]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A plant functional approach to the prediction of changes in Australian rangeland vegetation under grazing and fire

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additional data are needed to interpret low LNS, particularly with field observation. Given the extremely large areas of provincial, national, regional, and global degradation that are frequently stated (Bai et al, 2008;Bridges and Oldeman, 1999;Kassas, 1995;Oldeman, 1994;UNEP, 1997;Zika and Erb, 2009) and the far-reaching effects of degradation on human livelihoods (Adeel, 2008;UNCCD, 1994), rigorous, quantitative, and objective measurements are urgently needed. While reduction of NPP is a single type of degradation, it is a quantitative measure of the outcome of most forms of degradation relevant to human needs -but not all (e.g., loss of palatable species with no change in NPP; Asner and Heidebrecht, 2005).…”
Section: Anthropogenic and Environmental Degradationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additional data are needed to interpret low LNS, particularly with field observation. Given the extremely large areas of provincial, national, regional, and global degradation that are frequently stated (Bai et al, 2008;Bridges and Oldeman, 1999;Kassas, 1995;Oldeman, 1994;UNEP, 1997;Zika and Erb, 2009) and the far-reaching effects of degradation on human livelihoods (Adeel, 2008;UNCCD, 1994), rigorous, quantitative, and objective measurements are urgently needed. While reduction of NPP is a single type of degradation, it is a quantitative measure of the outcome of most forms of degradation relevant to human needs -but not all (e.g., loss of palatable species with no change in NPP; Asner and Heidebrecht, 2005).…”
Section: Anthropogenic and Environmental Degradationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…approaches that seem reasonable but have severe limitations, particularly when applied to large areas: visual assessment of satellite imagery is entirely subjective and therefore unrepeatable; field surveys, such as the National Resources Inventory (Nusser and Goebel, 1997), are limited to small areas (Budde et al, 2004;O'Connor et al, 2001;Prince, 2004) that can be assessed by an evaluator on the ground; and process modeling of potential production followed by comparison with actual production (Bai et al, 2008;Boer and Puigdefabregas, 2005) suffers from the need for data and parameters that are generally not available (Prince, 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most cases, fire and herbivory are independently investigated (Archibald, Bond, Stock, and Fairbanks, 2005), although more and more recent studies have examined these two disturbances together (Collins, 1987;Belsky, 1992;Noy-Meir, 1995;Boer and Stafford Smith, 2003;Harrison Inouye and Safford, 2003;Fuhlendorf and Engle, 2004;Fynn, Morris, and Edwards, 2005;Archibald et al, 2005). However, there is very little research on how these two agents influence the function of each other (Archibald et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Space-fortime substitution is then used to assume that the same changes in trait values would be observed following an environmental change of the same magnitude. Growing numbers of experiments have confirmed this assumption for responses to single environmental factors such as nutrient availability (Dyer et al 2001) or grazing (Bullock et al 2001), as do models of community or ecosystem dynamics (Pausas 1999, Colasanti et al 2001, Ackerly 2003, Boer & Stafford Smith 2003, Hickler et al 2004). …”
Section: Traits and Environmental Gradientsmentioning
confidence: 94%