2016
DOI: 10.1002/nag.2632
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A plane strain yield design approach to stability analysis of a column‐reinforced soil foundation under inclined loading

Abstract: The ultimate bearing capacity problem of column-reinforced foundations under inclined loading is investigated within the framework of static and kinematic approaches of yield design theory. The configuration of a native soft clayey soil reinforced by either a group of purely cohesive columns (lime-column technique) or a group of purely frictional columns (stone-column technique) is analyzed under plane strain conditions. First, lower bound estimates are derived for the ultimate bearing capacity by considering … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let us assume that each one of them is animated with a virtual rigid body movement and denote respectively trueU^false¯i=(),,trueU^xitrueU^yitrueU^zi and trueW^false¯i=(),,trueW^xitrueW^yitrueW^zi the displacement and the rotation velocities of a given Voronoï particle i according to a Cartesian base (),,exfalse¯eyfalse¯ezfalse¯. The yield design kinematic approach states that if a macroscopic bearable loading is applied on the concrete specimen boundaries, all kinematically admissible virtual movements 0.25emtrueUfalse^¯=()trueU^false¯i,trueW^false¯i with ( i ∈ [1, N ]) must verify the following condition: PeU^¯PrmU^¯ with Pe()trueU^false¯0.25em and Prm()trueU^false¯0.25em are respectively the external loading power and the maximum resisting power associated to trueUfalse^¯.…”
Section: The Yield Design Kinematic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Let us assume that each one of them is animated with a virtual rigid body movement and denote respectively trueU^false¯i=(),,trueU^xitrueU^yitrueU^zi and trueW^false¯i=(),,trueW^xitrueW^yitrueW^zi the displacement and the rotation velocities of a given Voronoï particle i according to a Cartesian base (),,exfalse¯eyfalse¯ezfalse¯. The yield design kinematic approach states that if a macroscopic bearable loading is applied on the concrete specimen boundaries, all kinematically admissible virtual movements 0.25emtrueUfalse^¯=()trueU^false¯i,trueW^false¯i with ( i ∈ [1, N ]) must verify the following condition: PeU^¯PrmU^¯ with Pe()trueU^false¯0.25em and Prm()trueU^false¯0.25em are respectively the external loading power and the maximum resisting power associated to trueUfalse^¯.…”
Section: The Yield Design Kinematic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The space containing all the virtual movements kinematically admissible has a finite dimension, because there is a finite number N of Voronoï particles in the cubic specimen. This means that by minimizing the maximum resisting power P rm while taking the virtual displacement and rotation velocities as variables, this convex domain will be reduced to the exact biaxial failure envelope of the concrete specimen . In the particular case of a uniaxial compression test, the inequality (1) gives an upper bound of the concrete uniaxial compressive strength, and by minimizing the P rm function, we will obtain its exact value when considering all kinematically admissible virtual particles movements.…”
Section: The Yield Design Kinematic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the problems mentioned above arise from a soft subgrade. A variety of ground improvement techniques have been adopted to address soft subgrade‐related issues, among others: grouting [eg,], soil mixing [eg,], micropile [eg,], soil nail [eg,], stone column [eg,], and rigid inclusions . The last one (also known as column‐supported embankment) are gaining more attention every time in geotechnical engineering in general [eg,], and in the railroad industry in particular [eg,].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Railroads issues associated with shrink/swell soils are discussed in detail in Sanchez et al 21 Most of the problems mentioned above arise from a soft subgrade. A variety of ground improvement techniques have been adopted to address soft subgrade-related issues, among others: grouting [eg, [22][23][24][25] ], soil mixing [eg, [26][27][28][29] ], micropile [eg, [30][31][32] ], soil nail [eg, [33][34][35][36] ], stone column [eg, [37][38][39][40], and rigid inclusions. [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52] The last one (also known as column-supported embankment) are gaining more attention every time in geotechnical engineering in general [eg, [53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61], and in the railroad industry in particular [eg, [62][63][64][65]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%