2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2014.02.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A pilot review of gradual versus goal re-initiation of enteral nutrition after burn surgery in the hemodynamically stable patient

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
6
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Shields et al found in their study of enterally fed adult burn patients who were grouped in either a goal rate reinitiation group or a slow reinitiation group after their first surgical procedure that there was no difference in feeding intolerances such as emesis, aspiration, or ischemic bowel. The group whose EN rate was resumed at goal rate postoperatively met a significantly higher amount of caloric goals vs the slow reinitiation group during the 36 hours postsurgery, indicating that a more aggressive approach to feeding preoperatively enhances nutrition intake and is well tolerated …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Shields et al found in their study of enterally fed adult burn patients who were grouped in either a goal rate reinitiation group or a slow reinitiation group after their first surgical procedure that there was no difference in feeding intolerances such as emesis, aspiration, or ischemic bowel. The group whose EN rate was resumed at goal rate postoperatively met a significantly higher amount of caloric goals vs the slow reinitiation group during the 36 hours postsurgery, indicating that a more aggressive approach to feeding preoperatively enhances nutrition intake and is well tolerated …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The group whose EN rate was resumed at goal rate postoperatively met a significantly higher amount of caloric goals vs the slow reinitiation group during the 36 hours postsurgery, indicating that a more aggressive approach to feeding preoperatively enhances nutrition intake and is well tolerated. 9 In our sample, EN was provided for >80% of the patients' MLOS (59.4 ± 45 days). EN was continuously infused during surgical and bedside procedures, through dressing and line changes, therapy, and airway management modifications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The risk of perioperative aspiration is low using these guidelines, and some are advocating continuing post-pyloric feeding without interruption during extra-abdominal surgical procedures. EN can be resumed post-operatively at the hourly rate tolerated prior to surgery, provided the patient is otherwise hemodynamically stable [41]. EN is routinely held when epinephrine or norepinephrine is initiated; however, there appears to be no contraindication to m a i n t a i n i n g E N w h e n t h e p a t i e n t i s o t h e r w i s e hemodynamically stable receiving either low-dose vasopressin or dobutamine.…”
Section: Interruptions In Enteral Nutritionmentioning
confidence: 99%