The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2003
DOI: 10.1378/chest.123.4.1018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Pilot Prospective, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure in Acute Asthmatic Attack

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
117
2
17

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 290 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
117
2
17
Order By: Relevance
“…This is supported by the improvement in spirometry shown by Brandão et al 21 with a higher level of expiratory pressure. Soroksky et al 23 reported a more rapid improvement in FEV 1 during NIV. In that study, aerosol bronchodilators were given during interruption of NIV (ie, not in line with NIV).…”
Section: Asthmamentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This is supported by the improvement in spirometry shown by Brandão et al 21 with a higher level of expiratory pressure. Soroksky et al 23 reported a more rapid improvement in FEV 1 during NIV. In that study, aerosol bronchodilators were given during interruption of NIV (ie, not in line with NIV).…”
Section: Asthmamentioning
confidence: 94%
“…34 The second trial was a single-centre trial of 33 patients that used sham noninvasive ventilation in the control group. 35 None of the patients were intubated, and all survived the hospital stay. However, there was a more rapid improvement in the forced expiratory volume in the first second ( paring two pressure levels of noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation with oxygen therapy alone, a greater reduction in dyspnea and a greater increase in FEV 1 were reported for the group that received noninvasive ventilation.…”
Section: Exacerbation Of Asthmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[34][35][36] One trial, which cited selection bias in patient enrolment leading to a small sample size (n = 35), found no differences in outcomes. 34 The second trial was a single-centre trial of 33 patients that used sham noninvasive ventilation in the control group.…”
Section: Exacerbation Of Asthmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4] However, in clinical practice, NIV is used beyond guideline recommendations, 5 and despite concerns about the effi- cacy of NIV as supportive therapy in ARF in patients with preexisting conditions other than COPD, NIV is broadly considered as the first line of respiratory support in patients with bronchiectasis, 6,7 rib cage or parenchymal restrictive diseases, [8][9][10] obesity, 11 or asthma. 12,13 Studies showed that, over the period 1998 -2008, NIV was increasingly used in patients suffering from COPD. 14, 15 Schnell et al 16 showed recently, in a multi-center database study of subjects who required ventilatory support for ARF between 1997 and 2011, that use of NIV improved outcomes in subjects with acute or chronic respiratory failure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%