2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-75341-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A physiologic overview of the organ-specific transcriptome of the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus

Abstract: To further obtain insights into the Rhipicephalus microplus transcriptome, we used RNA-seq to carry out a study of expression in (i) embryos; (ii) ovaries from partially and fully engorged females; (iii) salivary glands from partially engorged females; (iv) fat body from partially and fully engorged females; and (v) digestive cells from partially, and (vi) fully engorged females. We obtained > 500 million Illumina reads which were assembled de novo, producing > 190,000 contigs, identifying 18,857 coding … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 141 publications
(174 reference statements)
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The housekeeping functional class contributed to the majority of the composition of the transcriptome (80%) but with lower expression (51%), while the secretory protein functional class represented only 14% of the transcriptome but 46% of the total coverage. This was comparable to the overall description of the secretory category of other salivary gland transcriptomes from Amblyomma americanum , Ixodes ricinus, R. appendiculatus, R. microplus, R. pulchellus , R. sanguineus and R. zambeziensis (between 12 and 63%) 5 , 6 , 16 , 18 21 . Nonetheless, the transcriptomes displayed a dynamic range of expression with a few transcripts responsible for most of the expression in the salivary glands.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The housekeeping functional class contributed to the majority of the composition of the transcriptome (80%) but with lower expression (51%), while the secretory protein functional class represented only 14% of the transcriptome but 46% of the total coverage. This was comparable to the overall description of the secretory category of other salivary gland transcriptomes from Amblyomma americanum , Ixodes ricinus, R. appendiculatus, R. microplus, R. pulchellus , R. sanguineus and R. zambeziensis (between 12 and 63%) 5 , 6 , 16 , 18 21 . Nonetheless, the transcriptomes displayed a dynamic range of expression with a few transcripts responsible for most of the expression in the salivary glands.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…This confirmed that the translated proteins from R. evertsi evertsi are generally longer than the other Rhipicephalus transcriptomes, except for Rhipicephalus sanguineus . For an estimate of shared orthologs, the transcriptome was compared with the transcriptomes of Rhipicephalus appendiculatus 16 , Rhipicephalus microplus 17 , 18 , Rhipicephalus pulchellus 19 , R. sanguineus 20 and Rhipicephalus zambeziensis 21 using the reciprocal best hit approach (RBH). Pairwise comparisons indicated that RBHs between transcriptomes are similar, suggesting that the R. evertsi evertsi transcriptome possessed similar numbers of orthologs when compared to existing transcriptomes (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More recent investigations have confirmed the selective tissue tropisms of Coxiella sp. for the tick ovary and malpighian tubules in diverse tick species [14,27]. Other reports found Francisella sp.…”
Section: Definitions Of Terms Used In This Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…An elegant study by Lejal et al (2021) identified several positive and negative correlations between members of the field-collected, questing Ixodes ricinus microbiome and how some of these interactions are modulated by tick-borne pathogens. It has been established that each tick tissue (organ) undergoes unique responses to specific physiological changes, but it is not known whether these responses also induce changes in the microbial communities residing within these tissues (Franta et al, 2010; Schwarz et al, 2014; Crispell et al, 2016; Kumar et al, 2016; Budachetri et al, 2017; Starck et al, 2018; Tirloni et al, 2020; Kurokawa et al, 2020). In the current study, a high-throughput sequencing approach was utilized to examine microbiome changes throughout the ontogeny of uninfected and pathogen-infected Am.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%