2021
DOI: 10.1063/5.0039861
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A physics-based statistical model for nanoparticle deposition

Abstract: In this study, a general theoretical framework is proposed to analyze particle deposition on a substrate, based on statistical and physical considerations. A model is developed in the context of the proposed framework to quantitatively predict the particle deposition on the substrate in terms of coverage evolution. Its validity was then verified by a dip coating experiment, where a polydimethylsiloxane substrate was periodically immersed in a sonicated graphene solution. An extension of the model was subsequen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another striking particle is much more likely to bounce off an already assembled monolayer due to both the hard collision and the acoustic field maintaining dispersion. The time evolution of the substrate’s covered fraction, δ­( t ) = 1 – e –α C 0 a p t , depends on the single particle’s occupied area on the substrate, a p , the particles’ mass concentration C 0 , and , where m is the single particle mass. Figure g shows representative fitting results of the equation for δ­( t ) for a particle size of 761 nm at different concentrations, while Figure h shows the same analysis, as the one illustrated in Figure g, but for different particle sizes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another striking particle is much more likely to bounce off an already assembled monolayer due to both the hard collision and the acoustic field maintaining dispersion. The time evolution of the substrate’s covered fraction, δ­( t ) = 1 – e –α C 0 a p t , depends on the single particle’s occupied area on the substrate, a p , the particles’ mass concentration C 0 , and , where m is the single particle mass. Figure g shows representative fitting results of the equation for δ­( t ) for a particle size of 761 nm at different concentrations, while Figure h shows the same analysis, as the one illustrated in Figure g, but for different particle sizes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%