2021
DOI: 10.3390/aerospace8100292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Physics-Based Multidisciplinary Approach for the Preliminary Design and Performance Analysis of a Medium Range Aircraft with Box-Wing Architecture

Abstract: The introduction of disruptive innovations in the transport aviation sector is becoming increasingly necessary. This is because there are many very demanding challenges that the transport aviation system will have to face in the years ahead. In particular, the reduction in pollutant emissions from air transport, and its impact on climate change, clearly must be addressed; moreover, sustainable solutions must be found to meet the constantly increasing demand for air traffic, and to reduce the problem of airport… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To compute structural and system weight, the tool FLOPS developed by NASA has been used [60]: According to [60], structural weight includes wings, tails, fuselage, nacelle and paint; system weight considers control surfaces actuators, instruments, avionics, anti-icing and furnishing. It is worth noting that the classical model for cantilever wings overestimates the structural mass of the box-wing architecture [75][76][77][78], so the results reported in this paper (e.g., estimation of MTOW) are conservative. This tool is versatile since it can be used for aircraft ranging from general aviation to transport aircraft categories; in this paper, the general aviation category has been selected, since the weight formulation, adopted in this paper and described in FLOPS, have been specifically derived for general aviation aircraft category.…”
Section: Weight Estimationmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To compute structural and system weight, the tool FLOPS developed by NASA has been used [60]: According to [60], structural weight includes wings, tails, fuselage, nacelle and paint; system weight considers control surfaces actuators, instruments, avionics, anti-icing and furnishing. It is worth noting that the classical model for cantilever wings overestimates the structural mass of the box-wing architecture [75][76][77][78], so the results reported in this paper (e.g., estimation of MTOW) are conservative. This tool is versatile since it can be used for aircraft ranging from general aviation to transport aircraft categories; in this paper, the general aviation category has been selected, since the weight formulation, adopted in this paper and described in FLOPS, have been specifically derived for general aviation aircraft category.…”
Section: Weight Estimationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…‱ the possibility to exploit the advantages of the box-wing, i.e., the minimization of induced drag for given wingspan and lift, in several ways depending on the given priorities and needs: o to reduce the energy consumption for assigned payload-range and wingspan; o to enhance transport capabilities (payload and/or range) for assigned wingspan, as highlighted by the results of the PARSIFAL project [76]; o to reduce the wingspan for assigned payload-range [77].…”
Section: Sensitivity Analyses For Design Space Explorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where all quantities are relative to the gaseous phase, Nu is the Nusselt number for the natural convection inside the gaseous H 2 , h g is the heat transfer coefficient of the phenomenon, H g is the level of the gas inside the tank, expressed as distance from the top of the tank, and K is the thermal conductivity of the gaseous phase. As for assumptions (a), (b), and (c), the total internal thermal resistance is computed as in Equation (45), where S l and S g are the tank surfaces in contact with the liquid and gaseous phase, respectively.…”
Section: Tank Heat Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Airbus 320 or Boeing 737 family craft, while complying with the same airport constraints and, above all, reducing the fuel consumption per passenger-kilometre ( [43]). The designed aircraft has a box-wing architectures with the following main features: a number of passengers equal to 308, 66% more than the conventional competitor; a wingspan equal to 36 metres, and compatible with ICAO category 'C' airport aprons ([44]); a maximum reduction in block fuel per passenger-kilometre equal to 22% compared to the conventional competitor ( [45]). Figure 1 presents the final configuration of the PAR-SIFAL box-wing aircraft, whereas its main characteristics are reported in Table 6; for further details on the study and design of the box-wing aircraft developed within the PARSI-FAL project, please refer to [12], [43] and [45].…”
Section: Reference Aircraft and Lh 2 Aircraft Derivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The designed aircraft has a box-wing architectures with the following main features: a number of passengers equal to 308, 66% more than the conventional competitor; a wingspan equal to 36 metres, and compatible with ICAO category 'C' airport aprons ([44]); a maximum reduction in block fuel per passenger-kilometre equal to 22% compared to the conventional competitor ( [45]). Figure 1 presents the final configuration of the PAR-SIFAL box-wing aircraft, whereas its main characteristics are reported in Table 6; for further details on the study and design of the box-wing aircraft developed within the PARSI-FAL project, please refer to [12], [43] and [45]. Table 6, in addition to reporting the main characteristics of the box-wing aircraft used as a baseline for this LH 2 propulsion integration study, also reports how this integration was achieved by modifying the reference aircraft.…”
Section: Reference Aircraft and Lh 2 Aircraft Derivationmentioning
confidence: 99%