1978
DOI: 10.3109/17453677809005724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Photoelastic Study of a Model of the Proximal Femu:A Biomechanical Study of Unstable Trochanteric Fractures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Forces of up to 1250 N were applied (corresponding to more than half an average body weight but smaller compared to bone's linear response regime). These simulate a simple stance position configuration in which the femur is loaded through its head while the femur is inclined at % 7 to the shaft axis Jensen (1978) (along a virtual line that connects the femur head to the middle cavity in the femur diaphysis (intercondylar fossa)). Three inclination angles were considered: 0 for maximal sensitivity, 7 as in the natural stance posture, and 20 as in Keyak et al (1993).…”
Section: In Vitro Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forces of up to 1250 N were applied (corresponding to more than half an average body weight but smaller compared to bone's linear response regime). These simulate a simple stance position configuration in which the femur is loaded through its head while the femur is inclined at % 7 to the shaft axis Jensen (1978) (along a virtual line that connects the femur head to the middle cavity in the femur diaphysis (intercondylar fossa)). Three inclination angles were considered: 0 for maximal sensitivity, 7 as in the natural stance posture, and 20 as in Keyak et al (1993).…”
Section: In Vitro Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%