2018
DOI: 10.31826/jlr-2018-153-404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A phonological reconstruction of Proto-Cerrado (Jê family)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among other things, data from Kajkwakhrattxi reinforces well-known patterns in typology, such as palatalization before front vowels and flapping of [d]. In addition, our data provides evidence of sound changes that are, to best of our knowledge, unattested, such as the change from * (Nikulin 2016(Nikulin , 2017(Nikulin , 2020. Notably, Nikulin proposes that, in Kakjkwakhrattxi, PNJ *m and * > mb lenited to [w]; PNJ *mr and * > mbr merged to [r]; and PNJ * > mbj simplified to [j].…”
Section: Glosssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Among other things, data from Kajkwakhrattxi reinforces well-known patterns in typology, such as palatalization before front vowels and flapping of [d]. In addition, our data provides evidence of sound changes that are, to best of our knowledge, unattested, such as the change from * (Nikulin 2016(Nikulin , 2017(Nikulin , 2020. Notably, Nikulin proposes that, in Kakjkwakhrattxi, PNJ *m and * > mb lenited to [w]; PNJ *mr and * > mbr merged to [r]; and PNJ * > mbj simplified to [j].…”
Section: Glosssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…It will be critical for transparency and verifiability of these reconstructions for future works to explicitly and systematically present cognate and correspondence sets, and provide explicit argumentation for segmental and lexical reconstructions. Jolkesky (2010) and Nikulin (2017) provide distance-based classifications of Southern Jê and Northern Jê, respectively. Re-analysis of the extant cognate sets used in these analyses using character-based methods is obvious low-hanging fruit that could yield important insights into the internal classification of Jê.…”
Section: Caribanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The alternative proposal where devoicing of ND in Panará and Timbira is analyzed as unconditioned devoicing of voiced stops is strongly supported by comparative evidence. All voiced stops (both plain and pre-nasalized) in other closely related languages devoice unconditionally (either simultaneously or D devoices before ND) (Nikulin 2017). In other words, unconditioned devoicing of voiced stops operated as a sound change in the pre-history of Panará and Timbira.…”
Section: Post-nasal Devoicingmentioning
confidence: 99%