2020
DOI: 10.3390/languages5040058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Phonetic Account of Spanish-English Bilinguals’ Divergence with Agreement

Abstract: Does bilingual language influence in the domain of phonetics impact the morphosyntactic domain? Spanish gender is encoded by word-final, unstressed vowels (/a e o/), which may diphthongize in word-boundary vowel sequences. English neutralizes unstressed final vowels and separates across-word vocalic sequences. The realization of gender vowels as schwa, due to cross-linguistic influence, may remain undetected if not directly analyzed. To explore the potential over-reporting of gender accuracy, we conducted para… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
(74 reference statements)
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This spectral reduction in atonic vowels could be considered one linguistic result of the consistent contact and increased geographical proximity since the phonetic patterns of two named languages, 'Spanish' and 'English', used by an individual, have become more similar. The lack of word position effects found in the present study speaks to the fact that certain phonetic environments are more favorable or plausible sites for these phenomena, and that, at the very least, word position effects vary by community (Colantoni et al 2020). While the children all similarly realize vowels in atonic syllables different from those in tonic syllables, suggesting an overall change in the degree of phonetic convergence between Spanish-like and English-like sound patterns in Albuquerque, their /u/ fronting is more idiosyncratic and connected closely with their individual language use.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This spectral reduction in atonic vowels could be considered one linguistic result of the consistent contact and increased geographical proximity since the phonetic patterns of two named languages, 'Spanish' and 'English', used by an individual, have become more similar. The lack of word position effects found in the present study speaks to the fact that certain phonetic environments are more favorable or plausible sites for these phenomena, and that, at the very least, word position effects vary by community (Colantoni et al 2020). While the children all similarly realize vowels in atonic syllables different from those in tonic syllables, suggesting an overall change in the degree of phonetic convergence between Spanish-like and English-like sound patterns in Albuquerque, their /u/ fronting is more idiosyncratic and connected closely with their individual language use.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…The bulk of Hispanic linguistics research on word position and vocalic realizations has centered on mid-vowel raising in varieties of Spanish spoken in Mexico (see Barajas 2015;Dabkowski 2018 for reviews). However, many studies on bilinguals' vowel spaces have not focused on potential word position effects, even though it can be another site favoring phonetic convergence (Colantoni et al 2020). To further expand our range of data and explanatory variables, the present study tests if word position affects their vocalic realizations.…”
Section: Vowel Spaces Of Spanish-english Bilingualsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…From a linguistic perspective, it will be crucial to investigate in future studies whether differences in phonological production are mirrored in perception. Perception differences might have implications for the acquisition of morpho-syntactic properties, e.g., gender and number, which are typically marked by word-final sounds (Colantoni et al 2020). If these are perceived differently, they may also be produced differently.…”
Section: Conclusion and Relevancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed in the “ Voice characteristics analysis ” section, for racial subgroups, the principal differences in voice properties result from phonation/formant. Latinx vowels (including /ɑ/) are generally shorter (in duration) than other subgroups, vary little in quality and remain contrastive in stressed and unstressed positions 47 . Moreover, Latinx speakers have lower F1 during isolated /ɑ/ prolongations compared to White speakers.…”
Section: Results Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%