2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00280-011-1734-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A phase I study of daily everolimus plus low-dose weekly cisplatin for patients with advanced solid tumors

Abstract: The phase II recommended dose is everolimus 10 mg/day (days 1-21) + cisplatin 20 mg/m(2) (days 1, 8, and 15) of a 28-day cycle. PK data demonstrate dose-proportional increases in exposure, as previously described for everolimus monotherapy. Anti-tumor activity was observed in several tumor types.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
34
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Other regimens with reported efficacy in pulmonary carcinoid include liposomal doxorubicin + capecitabine (case report of a single patient with typical carcinoid and a partial response) [11], everolimus + cisplatin (of 3 patients with metastatic pulmonary carcinoid, partial response was seen in 2 patients with atypical disease and 1 patient had stable disease) [12], and navitoclax [25]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other regimens with reported efficacy in pulmonary carcinoid include liposomal doxorubicin + capecitabine (case report of a single patient with typical carcinoid and a partial response) [11], everolimus + cisplatin (of 3 patients with metastatic pulmonary carcinoid, partial response was seen in 2 patients with atypical disease and 1 patient had stable disease) [12], and navitoclax [25]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…stage IIB/IIIA) based on data showing a response rate of 20% to any chemotherapy [8], although this approach has been questioned by others who feel the role of systemic treatment is limited [9]. Regimens showing antitumor activity against pulmonary carcinoid tumors include octreotide [10], doxorubicin/capecitabine [11], everolimus + cisplatin [12], everolimus + octreotide [13], and etoposide + cisplatin [8]. The efficacy of adjuvant treatment for stages II and III resected typical and atypical carcinoid tumors is extrapolated from these response rates in metastatic disease, and the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in resected stage II and III non-small cell lung cancer trials [14], [15] and [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recently completed a phase I study of everolimus plus low-dose weekly cisplatin for patients with advanced solid tumors [11]. The favorable toxicity profile in that study suggests that it should be feasible to add paclitaxel to the mTORC1 inhibitor ?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por esta razão, diversos autores tem estudado os efeitos da inibição da via do mTOR em tumores de cabeça e pescoço (Fury et al, 2012;Molinolo et al, 2012;Sun et al, 2012), com resultados promissores. Em estudo clínico conduzido por Fury e colaboradores, a ação do inibidor de mTOR everolimus foi avaliada em uma série de pacientes com diferentes tipos de tumores sólidos, incluindo CECs de cabeça e pescoço.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Em estudo clínico conduzido por Fury e colaboradores, a ação do inibidor de mTOR everolimus foi avaliada em uma série de pacientes com diferentes tipos de tumores sólidos, incluindo CECs de cabeça e pescoço. Foi observada uma atividade anti-tumoral significativa neste grupo de pacientes, com redução ou estabilidade tumoral (Fury et al, 2012 Lippman e colaboradores, determinaram que para que um biomarcador possa ser considerado uma boa ferramenta diagnóstica, alguns fatores devem ser levados em consideração como a habilidade de se verificar a diferença entre um tecido normal e de alto risco; a possibilidade da identificação do mesmo em amostras com pequena dimensão; a capacidade de se estabelecer graduações ou padrões, e por fim, estudos preliminares clínicos que avaliem a relação destas proteínas com os agentes estudados (Lippman et al, 1990;Lee et al, 1992;Clark et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified