2019
DOI: 10.2136/vzj2019.07.0072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A pH‐Based Pedotransfer Function for Scaling Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity Reduction: Improved Estimation of Hydraulic Dynamics in HYDRUS

Abstract: Soil‐specific pedotransfer functions can be incorporated into the HYDRUS model. Electrolyte concentration reduces the adverse effect of pH and Na on soil structural stability. Clay content is important in governing soil hydraulic reduction dynamics due to pH. Hydraulic conductivity is a key soil property governing agricultural production and is thus an important parameter in hydrologic modeling. The pH scaling factor for saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks) reduction in the HYDRUS model was reviewed and eval… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(119 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While numerous experimental studies have led to models describing declines in K s due to salinity and sodicity, we are unaware of any model that considers differences between degradation and rehabilitation (McNeal and Coleman, 1966;McNeal, 1968;Yaron and Thomas, 1968;Lagerwerff et al, 1969;Russo, 1988;Ezlit et al, 2013;Ali et al, 2019). That is, all existing models assume that these two processes are strictly reversible, meaning decreases in K s can be restored simply by changing the chemical properties of the soil water (McNeal and Coleman, 1966;McNeal, 1968;Yaron and Thomas, 1968;Lagerwerff et al, 1969;Russo, 1988;Ezlit et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While numerous experimental studies have led to models describing declines in K s due to salinity and sodicity, we are unaware of any model that considers differences between degradation and rehabilitation (McNeal and Coleman, 1966;McNeal, 1968;Yaron and Thomas, 1968;Lagerwerff et al, 1969;Russo, 1988;Ezlit et al, 2013;Ali et al, 2019). That is, all existing models assume that these two processes are strictly reversible, meaning decreases in K s can be restored simply by changing the chemical properties of the soil water (McNeal and Coleman, 1966;McNeal, 1968;Yaron and Thomas, 1968;Lagerwerff et al, 1969;Russo, 1988;Ezlit et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clay dispersion, for instance, is widely understood to be irreversible (Goldenberg et al, 1983;Yaron et al, 2008). For this reason, a significant reduction in K s , i.e., a decrease of more than 15 %-25 % compared to its initial level, is considered a threshold beyond which a soil will suffer irreparable damage (Quirk and Schofield, 1955;McNeal and Coleman, 1966;Rengasamy et al, 1984;Cook et al, 2006;Bennett et al, 2019). Likewise, the experimental evidence that has considered degradation and rehabilitation together suggests that changes in K s are defined by hysteresis (Dane and Klute, 1977), the exact nature of which can be expected to vary on a soil-specific basis (Levy et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%