2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00382-021-05709-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A perturbed parameter ensemble of HadGEM3-GC3.05 coupled model projections: part 1: selecting the parameter combinations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 15-member PPE was based on the GC3.05 configuration of the UK Met Office Global Coupled Model (Williams et al 2017), a fully coupled version of the UK Met Office model featuring atmosphere and land (Walters et al 2017), ocean (Storkey et al 2017), and sea ice (Ridley et al 2017) components. Perturbations and the process for constructing the PPE used in UKCP Global is discussed in Sexton et al (2021) and the performance of the PPE is discussed in Yamazaki et al (2021). The 13 CMIP5 models were selected representing 12 different modelling groups, including a previous configuration of the UK Met Office model, HadGEM2; the selection was based on work by McSweeney et al (2015), which is summarised in Murphy et al (2018).…”
Section: Ukcpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 15-member PPE was based on the GC3.05 configuration of the UK Met Office Global Coupled Model (Williams et al 2017), a fully coupled version of the UK Met Office model featuring atmosphere and land (Walters et al 2017), ocean (Storkey et al 2017), and sea ice (Ridley et al 2017) components. Perturbations and the process for constructing the PPE used in UKCP Global is discussed in Sexton et al (2021) and the performance of the PPE is discussed in Yamazaki et al (2021). The 13 CMIP5 models were selected representing 12 different modelling groups, including a previous configuration of the UK Met Office model, HadGEM2; the selection was based on work by McSweeney et al (2015), which is summarised in Murphy et al (2018).…”
Section: Ukcpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To examine when this signal emerges, the combined frequency of the predominantly summer type patterns (1-6) is plotted against the combined frequency of the predominantly winter type patterns (25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30) for the lowest and highest emissions scenarios for UKCP Global RCP 2.6 and RCP 8.5 respectively (Fig. 6).…”
Section: Future Climate Signal In Weather Regimesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each ensemble member has a horizontal resolution of approximately 60km at mid-latitudes (called 'N216') and was run for a 200-year period from 1900-2100, using CMIP5 historical forcings and future scenarios consistent with RCP8.5 emissions (accounting for carbon cycle uncertainties). The latter was assessed using idealised forcing experiments in atmosphere-only simulations, where diversity in climate feedbacks, aerosol and CO2 forcings, and regional precipitation and temperature responses were targeted (Sexton et al 2021). The plausibility of the variants was assessed in a variety of historical and present-day experiments e.g.…”
Section: Base Model and Parameter Perturbationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for example, to study present-day climate performance (e.g. Yokohata et al 2013;Sexton et al 2019Sexton et al , 2021; climate feedbacks and sensitivities (e.g. Sanderson 2011;Collins et al 2011;Karmalkar et al 2019;Rostron et al 2020;Tsushima et al 2020); emergent constraints (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%