2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00382-020-05608-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A perturbed parameter ensemble of HadGEM3-GC3.05 coupled model projections: part 2: global performance and future changes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
3
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 15-member PPE was based on the GC3.05 configuration of the UK Met Office Global Coupled Model (Williams et al 2017), a fully coupled version of the UK Met Office model featuring atmosphere and land (Walters et al 2017), ocean (Storkey et al 2017), and sea ice (Ridley et al 2017) components. Perturbations and the process for constructing the PPE used in UKCP Global is discussed in Sexton et al (2021) and the performance of the PPE is discussed in Yamazaki et al (2021). The 13 CMIP5 models were selected representing 12 different modelling groups, including a previous configuration of the UK Met Office model, HadGEM2; the selection was based on work by McSweeney et al (2015), which is summarised in Murphy et al (2018).…”
Section: Ukcpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 15-member PPE was based on the GC3.05 configuration of the UK Met Office Global Coupled Model (Williams et al 2017), a fully coupled version of the UK Met Office model featuring atmosphere and land (Walters et al 2017), ocean (Storkey et al 2017), and sea ice (Ridley et al 2017) components. Perturbations and the process for constructing the PPE used in UKCP Global is discussed in Sexton et al (2021) and the performance of the PPE is discussed in Yamazaki et al (2021). The 13 CMIP5 models were selected representing 12 different modelling groups, including a previous configuration of the UK Met Office model, HadGEM2; the selection was based on work by McSweeney et al (2015), which is summarised in Murphy et al (2018).…”
Section: Ukcpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. This set of 25 coupled variants was then filtered down to 20, with the 5 members excluded because their simulated climate was unrealistically cool by 1970, or because they suffered from numerical instabilities (Murphy et al 2018;Yamazaki et al 2021). 3.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we provide a summary description of the PPE. Further details, including a description of the GC3.05 base model, can be found in Yamazaki et al (2021).…”
Section: Base Model and Parameter Perturbationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further screening was applied to the variants run as fully coupled simulations. An initial ensemble of 25 members was reduced, first to 20 members and then to 15, based on criteria such as: numerical stability; the strength of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC); historical trends in northern hemisphere surface air temperatures; and climatological temperature biases (Yamazaki et al 2021).…”
Section: Base Model and Parameter Perturbationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation