2016 Sixth International Conference on Innovative Computing Technology (INTECH) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/intech.2016.7845024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A personalization system for data visualization platforms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [33], authors state that the adaptation is made on-demand on their proof of concept dashboard, but they don't mention this issue. In [32], [45], the authors suggest that the restructuring period is previously set in each restructurer agents' agendas, but they don't identify or test the implications of these restructuration periods. Adaptation time or adaptation triggers are relevant factors to address when using this approach, because continually changing the user interface could annoy users [53] and be counterproductive, despite the potential benefits of the adaptation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [33], authors state that the adaptation is made on-demand on their proof of concept dashboard, but they don't mention this issue. In [32], [45], the authors suggest that the restructuring period is previously set in each restructurer agents' agendas, but they don't identify or test the implications of these restructuration periods. Adaptation time or adaptation triggers are relevant factors to address when using this approach, because continually changing the user interface could annoy users [53] and be counterproductive, despite the potential benefits of the adaptation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This solution takes advantage of ''pairs of events that have happened in sequence'' that fed the Apriori algorithm to obtain a set of if-then rules that will be used to restructure the dashboard in terms of the presented data and visualization types employed. In a study referencing those mentioned above [45], the same authors specify that their solution also supports the restructuration of the dashboards through other methods, like Markov chains or top-k queries, but they don't detail these processes.…”
Section: E Has Any Artificial Intelligence Approach Been Applied To mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as mentioned in Vázquez-Ingelmo, Garcia-Peñalvo & Therón (2019a), the resulting dashboard can not be modified at run-time, unlike some of the approaches mentioned previously (Belo et al). Belo et al (2016) presented a multi-agent system for dashboard generation and restructuring that they implemented in the context of cloud-based data warehouses, but the metrics and data sources could be changed and the authors mentioned that other domains could benefit from this approach. They suggest having agents such as the ones for data visualization, profiling evaluation and personalization, and multidimensional data access.…”
Section: Rq1: Have Tailoring Capabilities Ever Been Applied To Performance Dashboards In the Past?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to their prior research, Belo et al (2016) rely on usage logs to profile users and offer them recommendations for improvement. These user logs contain user-system interactions, such as: periods of greatest activity, most requested data, querying preferences, etc.…”
Section: Rq2: Which Factors Should Be Taken Into Account When Designing Tailoring Capabilities Specifically For Performance Dashboards (Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation