2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.105380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A peridynamics study for the free-surface-assisted rock fragmentation caused by TBM disc cutters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 54 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerical simulation can both highly restore the dynamic process of disc cutter breaking rock, and make up for the shortcomings of high cost and poor repeatability of indoor tests. Commonly used numerical analysis methods to simulate the rock breaking of a disc cutter include FEM [59], the GPD method [60], FEM-SPH [61], FEM-DEM [62], 3DEC [63], FLAC3D [5], RBD-DEM [64], PFC3D [65,66], MatDEM [67], and Peridynamics [68]. Although the basic disc cutter force can be obtained by linear cutting test, the rockbreaking method used in the test is different from the rotary cutting of the disc cutter in the actual project.…”
Section: The External Excitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical simulation can both highly restore the dynamic process of disc cutter breaking rock, and make up for the shortcomings of high cost and poor repeatability of indoor tests. Commonly used numerical analysis methods to simulate the rock breaking of a disc cutter include FEM [59], the GPD method [60], FEM-SPH [61], FEM-DEM [62], 3DEC [63], FLAC3D [5], RBD-DEM [64], PFC3D [65,66], MatDEM [67], and Peridynamics [68]. Although the basic disc cutter force can be obtained by linear cutting test, the rockbreaking method used in the test is different from the rotary cutting of the disc cutter in the actual project.…”
Section: The External Excitationmentioning
confidence: 99%