2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1616-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Periacetabular Osteotomy for the Treatment of Severe Dysplastic Hips

Abstract: Background We believe a curved periacetabular osteotomy is indicated for treatment of severe dysplastic hips with center-edge angles less than 0°,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, lately, more and more emphasis is being laid on acetabuloplasty as a primary procedure in addition to the reduction. In a study by Karashima et al ., a periacetabular osteotomy as a primary procedure gives excellent results in severely dysplastic hips (C-E angle < 0°) and mild dysplastic hips (C-E angle 3.3-14.5°) 9. In their study including 71 patients, Spence et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, lately, more and more emphasis is being laid on acetabuloplasty as a primary procedure in addition to the reduction. In a study by Karashima et al ., a periacetabular osteotomy as a primary procedure gives excellent results in severely dysplastic hips (C-E angle < 0°) and mild dysplastic hips (C-E angle 3.3-14.5°) 9. In their study including 71 patients, Spence et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Additionally, 18 hips (75%) were defined as acetabular side deformity under the hypothetical situation of either positive cross over sign or posterior wall sign. Regarding the surgical treatment for DDH, various forms of periacetabular osteotomy have been proposed and reported with their surgical outcome [12] [20]. Al-though these procedures can effectively improve lateral coverage of the femoral head, inadvertent post-operative acetabular retroversion has also been reported [6] [10] [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We investigated the results of CPO alone for the treatment of severe dysplastic hips (44 hips) of Severin32) group IV-b, compared to those for moderate dysplastic hips (147 hips) of Severin group III and IV-a 33). The mean postoperative acetabular roof obliquity and head lateralization index values did not differ significantly between the two groups.…”
Section: Older Patients and Severity Of Acetabular Dysplasia For Indimentioning
confidence: 99%