IECON 2018 - 44th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society 2018
DOI: 10.1109/iecon.2018.8591698
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Performance Comparison of Stationary Frame Control of Three-Leg and Four-Leg Voltage Source Inverters in Power System Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The control over zero-sequence currents in four-leg PV VSIs is discussed in [201], while a VU mitigation technique using three-phase damping control is suggested in [202]. A hierarchical control strategy proposed in [203], a combination of three-and four-leg VSIs in [204], switching of single-phase inverters between the three phases with the lowest phase voltage [205], and model adaptive reference control for an adaptive PI derivative controller [206] are some of the other approaches that have been proposed for VU mitigation in the network. Zhu et al [207] proposed a coordination control strategy for a hybrid energy storage system consisting of a battery and ultra-capacitor, for good performance under unbalanced and non-linear load conditions in which the battery provides the fundamental powers, while the ultra-capacitor provides the compensating power.…”
Section: Fig 4 Block Diagram Of a Typical Control Scheme For Addressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The control over zero-sequence currents in four-leg PV VSIs is discussed in [201], while a VU mitigation technique using three-phase damping control is suggested in [202]. A hierarchical control strategy proposed in [203], a combination of three-and four-leg VSIs in [204], switching of single-phase inverters between the three phases with the lowest phase voltage [205], and model adaptive reference control for an adaptive PI derivative controller [206] are some of the other approaches that have been proposed for VU mitigation in the network. Zhu et al [207] proposed a coordination control strategy for a hybrid energy storage system consisting of a battery and ultra-capacitor, for good performance under unbalanced and non-linear load conditions in which the battery provides the fundamental powers, while the ultra-capacitor provides the compensating power.…”
Section: Fig 4 Block Diagram Of a Typical Control Scheme For Addressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the QAB converter is always transferring an equal amount of power through the two ports connected to the MMC cells while the others ports are free for power transfer whilst maintaining the power constraint equations ( 6) and (7). So, the voltage phase-shift angles from port 1 and port 2 must be the same and they are set to zero for reference (e.g.…”
Section: B Quad Active Bridge -Mmc Based Sst: Power Transfer Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum power that these ports handle is 1 [p.u], that is the case when D 3 = D 4 = ±0.5. On the other hand, port 3 and port 4 can inject or drain a maximum power of 1.5 [p.u], again, all the cases are under the energy balance constraint given by equations ( 6) and (7). Fig.…”
Section: B Quad Active Bridge -Mmc Based Sst: Power Transfer Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation