2005
DOI: 10.3402/tellusa.v57i3.14666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A performance comparison of coupled and uncoupled versions of the Met Office seasonal prediction general circulation model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is difficult to compare the operational predictive skill of IRI's forecast system with that of other systems such as a single-tiered dynamical system [e.g., Palmer et al 2004 (and references therein); Graham et al 2005;Saha et al 2006;Kug et al 2008;Wang et al 2008] or a purely empirical system (Van den Dool 2007). Improvement in ENSO prediction has obvious value toward improvement of climate prediction, and the potential predictability of ENSO is an open question but believed not fully realized (Chen and Cane 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is difficult to compare the operational predictive skill of IRI's forecast system with that of other systems such as a single-tiered dynamical system [e.g., Palmer et al 2004 (and references therein); Graham et al 2005;Saha et al 2006;Kug et al 2008;Wang et al 2008] or a purely empirical system (Van den Dool 2007). Improvement in ENSO prediction has obvious value toward improvement of climate prediction, and the potential predictability of ENSO is an open question but believed not fully realized (Chen and Cane 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first type consisted of ''potential predictability'' or ''reference'' runs, obtained by driving the malaria model with the correct ERA-40 data for both spinup and the duration of the forecast period. The second consisted of ''best-guess'' runs (referred to henceforth as control runs), obtained using a similar methodology to ensemble streamflow prediction (ESP) used in operational hydrology to predict likely future flows (Carpenter and Georgakakos 2004;Wood et al 2005), and analogous to the ''persistence'' forecasts often used as a baseline in seasonal forecasting-where a model is driven by observed conditions up to the forecast origin and then constant conditions such as persisted SST anomalies for the forecast period (e.g., Graham et al 2005). Here, the malaria model was driven with the correct spinup data for a given year, followed by data for the forecast period taken in turn from ERA-40 for each of the other 19 (wrong) yr.…”
Section: A Production Of Malaria Reforecastsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, numerical models are complex and required high computing power for a full ensemble running. The choice of whether to use a numerical or statistical model for seasonal prediction ultimately depends on the focus because the prediction skill strongly depends on the location and the season (Goddard et al 2001;Anderson et al 2003;Graham et al 2005;Jin et al 2008) Fig. 14 a Time series of 1,000 hPa AT anomalies for January, averaged over the central pacific (|r|>0.70, Fig.…”
Section: Comparison With Coupled Gcm Prediction Skillsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ENSO is the most successfully predicted large-scale phenomenon on seasonal to inter-annual scales, and the ENSO prediction is thus the starting point for assessment of seasonal prediction models (Goddard et al 2001;Graham et al 2005). ENSO prediction skills for the most characteristics coupled GCMs are shown in Table 5.…”
Section: Comparison With Coupled Gcm Prediction Skillsmentioning
confidence: 99%