2019
DOI: 10.1007/s13755-019-0076-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A performance based feature selection technique for subject independent MI based BCI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“… SVM has a much greater average accuracy than the other classifiers. [ 14 ] (Joadder, Myszewski et al, 2019) log variance RMS Decision tree median LDA SVM mean k-NN 87% 78% 93% 99% Using mean as a feature extraction method and K-NN as a classifier was the most effective combination for them to get the highest accuracy. [ 15 ] (Baig, Aslam et al, 2017) DE-based feature selection LDA SVM 95.6% 95.6% While all other subjects have classification accuracy above 90%, the subject “av” has the lowest classification accuracy of any by this method, at 88.9%.…”
Section: Table A1mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… SVM has a much greater average accuracy than the other classifiers. [ 14 ] (Joadder, Myszewski et al, 2019) log variance RMS Decision tree median LDA SVM mean k-NN 87% 78% 93% 99% Using mean as a feature extraction method and K-NN as a classifier was the most effective combination for them to get the highest accuracy. [ 15 ] (Baig, Aslam et al, 2017) DE-based feature selection LDA SVM 95.6% 95.6% While all other subjects have classification accuracy above 90%, the subject “av” has the lowest classification accuracy of any by this method, at 88.9%.…”
Section: Table A1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [ 14 ], Joadder, Myszewski, et al, 2019 used a method wherein the developed methods were trained and validated using data from all subjects from BCI Competition III dataset IVa. Each time the highest-performing feature was combined with more features, the classification accuracy decreased, indicating that the additional characteristics increased the amount of duplicate information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, model training usually requires abundant labeled training data. Nevertheless, the acquisition of EEG signals is not easy as it is time-consuming and expensive [10], [11]. This fact gives rise to another problem, that is, only a small number of samples can be used for training.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%