Proceedings of the 1994 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation
DOI: 10.1109/robot.1994.351317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A penalty function method for constrained motion planning

Abstract: In this paper, we establish necessary and suficient conditions under which manipulation constraints are holonomic. Then we present a systematic approach to motion planning in the presence of manipulation constraints deriving j b m this theory. Its principle is to replace a constrained problem by a convergent series of less constrained subproblems increasingly penalizing motions that do not satisfy the constraints. Each subproblem is solved using a standard path planner. We use the method of Variational Dynamic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An approach to constrained motion planning for robotic systems with many degrees of freedom is introduced in [108]. It first establishes which are the conditions under which the manipulation constraints are holonomic.…”
Section: Planning and Graspingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An approach to constrained motion planning for robotic systems with many degrees of freedom is introduced in [108]. It first establishes which are the conditions under which the manipulation constraints are holonomic.…”
Section: Planning and Graspingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This heuristic approach led to impressive results for solving realistic problems. Another heuristic planner proposed in [5] iteratively deforms a coordinated path first generated in the composite configuration space using a variational dynamic programming technique that progressively enforces the manipulation constraints.…”
Section: Discrete Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1,2,5,12,18]) assume that finite sets of stable placements and possible grasps of the movable object are given in the definition of the problem. Consequently, a part of the task decomposition is thus resolved by the user since the initial knowledge provided with these finite sets has to contain the grasps and the intermediate placements required to solve the problem.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both control theory and dynamic-game theory, the classic set of problems that can be solved are those with a linear state transition equation and quadratic loss functional [2], [5], [18], [65]. Because few problems can be solved analytically, there has been a large focus on numerical dynamic optimization procedures [12], [13], [66], [67], particularly in robotics applications [6], [54], [90], [106].…”
Section: Computing Optimal Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%