2010 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium 2010
DOI: 10.1109/ultsym.2010.5935662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A PC-based fully-programmable medical ultrasound imaging system using a graphics processing unit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Elnokrashy et al (2009) described a lowcost system for reconstruction and display of 4D ultrasound data. Similar frameworks were proposed by Kim et al (2010) and Brattain and Howe (2011). Recently, So et al (2011) made a comparison between CPUs and GPUs for ultrasound systems, in terms of power efficiency and cost effectiveness.…”
Section: Ultrasoundmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Elnokrashy et al (2009) described a lowcost system for reconstruction and display of 4D ultrasound data. Similar frameworks were proposed by Kim et al (2010) and Brattain and Howe (2011). Recently, So et al (2011) made a comparison between CPUs and GPUs for ultrasound systems, in terms of power efficiency and cost effectiveness.…”
Section: Ultrasoundmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In recent years, a dynamic development of parallel processing technology, especially multi-core processors (CPU) and general purpose graphics processing units (GPGPU) enabled migration of hardware based signal processing to more flexible software based signal processing. This trend is clearly visible in literature, where numerous studies are devoted to GPGPU applications in ultrasound signal processing [1][2][3][4]. However, acquisition and communication architecture of the system are equally important.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As the integration technology advances, the various types of the hand-held ultrasound (US) imaging devices were proposed for point-of-care applications [1][2][3][4][5][6]. For example, G.-D. Kim et al minimized the system footprint by using a single low-cost FPGA (Spartan-3, Xilinx Inc., San Jose, CA, USA) for the laptop-type portable US imaging system [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the smart US probe system controllable with the general-purpose devices such as PC, smartphone, or tablet PC have researched in decade to substantially enhance the accessibility and portability of the hand-held US imaging system [3][4][5][6]. However, since the general-purpose devices conventionally provides the limited data transfer rate, data compression method for the raw radio-frequency (RF) data acquired from the US transducer was proposed [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%