2006
DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2006.883802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Patient-Adapting Heartbeat Classifier Using ECG Morphology and Heartbeat Interval Features

Abstract: Abstract-An adaptive system for the automatic processing of the electrocardiogram (ECG) for the classification of heartbeats into one of the five beat classes recommended by ANSI/AAMI EC57:1998 standard is presented. The heartbeat classification system processes an incoming recording with a global-classifier to produce the first set of beat annotations. An expert then validates and if necessary corrects a fraction of the beats of the recording. The system then adapts by first training a local-classifier using … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
234
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 415 publications
(235 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
234
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For feeding the classification process, we adopted in this study different representation of the ECG signals, which are the standard temporal signal morphology, the discrete wavelet transform domain, the S-transform characteristics and the high-order statistics. In addition, for each representation, we considered also three temporal features that are the QRS complex duration, the RR interval (i.e., time span between two consecutive R points representing the distance between the QRS peaks of the present and previous beats), and the RR interval averaged over the ten last beats [2]. In order to train the GP classifier and to assess its accuracy, we selected randomly from the 18 records 600 beats for the training set (i.e., 300 samples for both PVC and non-PVC classes, respectively).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For feeding the classification process, we adopted in this study different representation of the ECG signals, which are the standard temporal signal morphology, the discrete wavelet transform domain, the S-transform characteristics and the high-order statistics. In addition, for each representation, we considered also three temporal features that are the QRS complex duration, the RR interval (i.e., time span between two consecutive R points representing the distance between the QRS peaks of the present and previous beats), and the RR interval averaged over the ten last beats [2]. In order to train the GP classifier and to assess its accuracy, we selected randomly from the 18 records 600 beats for the training set (i.e., 300 samples for both PVC and non-PVC classes, respectively).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, in the last years, several PVC detection system have been proposed for this issue: based on Artificial Neural Network (ANN) (Bortolan et al, 1991;Dalvi et al, 2016;Hu et al, 1997;Inan et al, 2006), Heuristic algorithm (Dotsinsky and Stoyanov, 2004), Bayesian framework (Sayadi et al, 2010), Support Vector Machine (SVM) (Shen et al, 2011), morphology ECG features (Chazal and Reilly, 2006;Chazal et al, 2004;Lek-uthai et al, 2014), Fuzzy Neural Network System (FNNS) (Lim, 2009), Wavelet Transform (Inan et al, 2006;Martis et al, 2013;Nazarahari et al, 2015;Orozco-Duque et al, 2013;Shyu et al, 2004;Yochum et al, 2016) and adaptive filter (Nieminaki et al, 1999;Solosenko et al, 2015). The main feature of most detection methods is a real-time analysis, however some methods have high mathematical complexity, which demands a high computational cost.…”
Section: Real-time Premature Ventricular Contractions Detection Basedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This software component is implemented under the form of a desktop application that runs on one or several computers inside the monitoring centre [3][4][5][6][7][8]. By means of this application, the specialist doctor has access to the medical record data, the current ECG investigation as well as to the history of all ECG investigations made for the patient in the past, no matter the place where these were realized (another family doctor).…”
Section: Ecg Monitoring Modulementioning
confidence: 99%