2000
DOI: 10.1051/jp4:2000907
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A path-dependent constitutive model for gilding copper

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may have been due to a lack of failure modes in the model used. A more advanced path-dependent model has been developed to address such issues (Gould & Goldthorpe 2000). The rods were found to deform symmetrically within the experimental error.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This may have been due to a lack of failure modes in the model used. A more advanced path-dependent model has been developed to address such issues (Gould & Goldthorpe 2000). The rods were found to deform symmetrically within the experimental error.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fracture was not observed. The existence of bulges or shoulders that are distinct from the deformation close to the impact interface is thought to be a sign of strain hardening (Gould & Goldthorpe 2000).…”
Section: K1mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The applicability of these models to transient deformation states however, has been largely ignored. To address path-dependent effects, a few models have recently been developed, such as the modified ArmstrongZerilli model by Goldthorpe et al 12 and Gould and Goldthorpe 13 and the empirical model of Frechard et al 14 Validation of these path-linked models through comparison with transient profiles has shown improvements over the traditional models. 14,15 However, the use of approaches that provide complementary measures of transient deformation states and require adherence to transient phenomenon has yet to be adopted as a general rule for model validation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%