2019
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1424/1/012045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Path Analysis: Study of Correlation Between Noise Intensity and Quality of Life of Workers In Textile Industry

Abstract: Noise intensity is a dangerous stressor in the working environment of the textile industry that can have an impact on the decrease in hearing loss of workers. The decrease in hearing loss will disrupt the workers’ activities in their daily work. Textile industry workers exposed to noise while working every day will potentially be affected by a decrease in hearing loss. Activities that are constantly exposed to noise intensity can also result in a decrease in the quality of workers’ life. This research was cond… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The physical workload in workplaces comes from the daily activities of the weaving operator, interaction between workers, mastery of skills in completing tasks, and abilities for operating the weaving machine in a standing position for 8 hours per day, additional workloads (temperature, heat, and humidity) [13]. The operation of the weaving machine includes the work of installing and removing yarn during the weaving process of the machine [14].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physical workload in workplaces comes from the daily activities of the weaving operator, interaction between workers, mastery of skills in completing tasks, and abilities for operating the weaving machine in a standing position for 8 hours per day, additional workloads (temperature, heat, and humidity) [13]. The operation of the weaving machine includes the work of installing and removing yarn during the weaving process of the machine [14].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%