2010
DOI: 10.1590/s1413-81232010000400026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A participação e a criatividade como ferramentas de análise das políticas públicas

Abstract: In the context of current globalization, important modifications of the international relations and of the ideological, technical, and cultural components in the administration of the States are expressed by non-legitimate public action principles which account for social iniquity and the weakening of the role of the State. Regardless of its political origin or ideological orientation, the economic development plans and programs exhibit a prevailing uniformity. The challenge today implies mobilizing in local c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We could trace the path of forms of participation in research since Lewin's action research in the United States in the 1930s (Barros, 1994), passing through the emergence of a Latin American tradition in the 1950s and 1960s of participatory research linked to different social movements of emancipatory vocation (Brandão, 2006) and finally arriving to the current knowledge production methodologies linked to complexity theory, such as sociopraxis (Cordeiro;Araújo Júnior, 2010), which evokes the matrices of participatory democracy to challenge research problems and the direction of public policy. There is also the affirmation of the social relevance of knowledge production and its link with social movements, related to Southern epistemology and post-abyssal methodologies (Santos, 2018).…”
Section: Intervention Research Participation and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We could trace the path of forms of participation in research since Lewin's action research in the United States in the 1930s (Barros, 1994), passing through the emergence of a Latin American tradition in the 1950s and 1960s of participatory research linked to different social movements of emancipatory vocation (Brandão, 2006) and finally arriving to the current knowledge production methodologies linked to complexity theory, such as sociopraxis (Cordeiro;Araújo Júnior, 2010), which evokes the matrices of participatory democracy to challenge research problems and the direction of public policy. There is also the affirmation of the social relevance of knowledge production and its link with social movements, related to Southern epistemology and post-abyssal methodologies (Santos, 2018).…”
Section: Intervention Research Participation and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Entende-se por domínio os limites de ação e de autonomia associados a cada uma das partes. Cordeiro et al, (2010), ressaltam que as políticas públicas e os projetos públicos saudáveis se diferenciam porque possibilitam intervenções na realidade, organizadas pela sociedade e viabilizadas pelo Estado, governo e instituições públicas e outras que enfatizam proposições e ações que oportunizem uma mudança social amparada numa vida com qualidade. Consequentemente, isso demanda uma série de atividades relacionadas e intencionadamente direcionadas à obtenção de um impacto positivo sobre a demanda dos que serão atingidos pelos resultados, tendo como finalidade o bem-estar, a emancipação e o desenvolvimento saudável, ainda que se expressem por intermédio de dimensões econômicas, políticas, sociais, ideológicas e culturais.…”
unclassified
“…The approach to such questions must be further explored based on methodological designs that include participants as the protagonists of the knowledge production process 16,17,24 .The utilization of participatory methodologies can contribute significantly to the field of studies related to childcare. However, what is viewed as participation and the procedures taken to promote it can vary a lot [25][26][27][28][29] . In view of the variety present in the field, it is necessary to explain what we understand as participation in this study.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%