2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.05.133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A parametric comparative study of electrocoagulation and coagulation using ultrafine quartz suspensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2). It was also observed during the experiments that long operating times, high voltage values, and bubbling of hydrogen gas at the cathode removed the turbidity and COD from the electrolyte (POME), as previously reported by Kilic et al (2009). Kilic and Hosten (2010) also reported the removal of 90% turbidity while conducting EC of aqueous suspensions of kaolinite powders with a concentration of 0.2 g L −1 using electrical input of 40 V, 20 min operating time, and NaCl.…”
Section: Removal Of Chemical Oxygen Demand and Turbidity Of Palm Oil supporting
confidence: 80%
“…2). It was also observed during the experiments that long operating times, high voltage values, and bubbling of hydrogen gas at the cathode removed the turbidity and COD from the electrolyte (POME), as previously reported by Kilic et al (2009). Kilic and Hosten (2010) also reported the removal of 90% turbidity while conducting EC of aqueous suspensions of kaolinite powders with a concentration of 0.2 g L −1 using electrical input of 40 V, 20 min operating time, and NaCl.…”
Section: Removal Of Chemical Oxygen Demand and Turbidity Of Palm Oil supporting
confidence: 80%
“…1 and 2) and procedures were given in a previous study [9]. Experimental variables of electrocoagulation and conventional coagulation studies are presented in Table 2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EC studies presented in this category of waters can be simplified to have been conducted using small-scale laboratory Al, Fe, or SS batch reactors and synthetic model water or wastewater with only one particular pollutant removed (see Table 7). Therefore, not all of the studies [13,[122][123][124][125][126][127][128][129][130][131][132][133][134][135][136][137] are discussed in the following text (although the optimum conditions found are presented in Table 7), but only those which differ notably from this in some way. Table 7 presents a summary of recent applications of EC in the treatment of waters containing heavy metals, cyanide, and other elements and ions.…”
Section: Model Water and Wastewater Containing Heavy Metals Nutrientmentioning
confidence: 99%