2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.01.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A parameter-efficient deep learning approach to predict conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
151
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 283 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
7
151
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, high cross-validated results were found by other studies who combined structural MRI with clinical and neuropsychological information (i.e. [7,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] ): AUROC = 0.902; balanced accuracy = 80.5%) In addition, a recent study [44] presented a highly performing deep learning algorithm (AUROC = 0.925; accuracy = 86%; sensitivity = 87.5%; specificity = 85%) and, to the best of our knowledge, this is the only available study using structural MRI in which a a proper testing of the algorithm was performed. Some particularly promising cross-validated results were also found in some studies which considered also APOE genotyping, together with EEG, ( [45] : AUROC = 0.97; sensitivity = 96.7%; specificity = 86%) or blood biomarkers [7,10,16] : balanced accuracy = 92.5%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, high cross-validated results were found by other studies who combined structural MRI with clinical and neuropsychological information (i.e. [7,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] ): AUROC = 0.902; balanced accuracy = 80.5%) In addition, a recent study [44] presented a highly performing deep learning algorithm (AUROC = 0.925; accuracy = 86%; sensitivity = 87.5%; specificity = 85%) and, to the best of our knowledge, this is the only available study using structural MRI in which a a proper testing of the algorithm was performed. Some particularly promising cross-validated results were also found in some studies which considered also APOE genotyping, together with EEG, ( [45] : AUROC = 0.97; sensitivity = 96.7%; specificity = 86%) or blood biomarkers [7,10,16] : balanced accuracy = 92.5%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Only a very small number of machine learning algorithms for the prediction of conversion from MCI to AD were subjected to a proper testing protocol, rather than only a cross-validation protocol, which limits the soundness of the evidence of their predictive performance. As such, apart from [42,44] , all the previously mentioned results may be optimistically biased estimates of the generalized performance of such algorithms as a proper testing protocol was not applied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A new technique deep learning-based technique by [12] to primary identify the mild cognitive impairment (MCI) patients with more risk to convert in to AD within 3 years. Using ADNI database they combine the base-line structural MRI, neuropsychological, demographic, and APOe4 genetic data.…”
Section: F Deep Autoencoder (Da)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study differs from previous studies on predictive modelling in the fact that we are interested in predicting the evolution of specific neuroradiological MRI features (i.e., WMH in T2-FLAIR), not the progression of a disease as a whole and/or its effect. For example, previous studies have proposed methods for predicting the progression from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease (Spasov et al, 2019) and progression of cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease patients (Choi et al, 2018). Instead, our proposed DEP model generates three outcomes: 1) prediction of WMH volumetric changes (i.e., either progressing or regressing), 2) estimation of WMH spatial changes, and 3) spatial distribution of white matter evolution at the voxellevel precision.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%