2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2005.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A parallel fictitious domain multigrid preconditioner for the solution of Poisson’s equation in complex geometries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although this latter approach leads to a problem‐dependent method, it is also likely to lead to an optimal set of methods for a given application. Advantages of this approach have already been observed in case of numerical simulations based on uniform Cartesian grids irrespective of the complexity of the problem domain which can be overcome using fictitious domain or immersed boundary approach . The present work is another attempt in this direction but with non‐uniform Cartesian grids which can better capture the development of shear driven flows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although this latter approach leads to a problem‐dependent method, it is also likely to lead to an optimal set of methods for a given application. Advantages of this approach have already been observed in case of numerical simulations based on uniform Cartesian grids irrespective of the complexity of the problem domain which can be overcome using fictitious domain or immersed boundary approach . The present work is another attempt in this direction but with non‐uniform Cartesian grids which can better capture the development of shear driven flows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…On structured Cartesian grids where a sequence of nested grids can be easily generated, the GMG scheme provides an optimal performance, and can be easily parallelized . It has also been extended for use on complex problem domains in conjunction with fictitious domain or immersed boundary method . AMG method is very promising for unstructured grids on complex geometries .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is a significant number of publications related to the numerical solution of different PDE on irregular domains with uniform embedded meshes. For example, we can mention the following fictitious domain numerical methods that use uniform embedded meshes: the embedded finite difference method, the cut finite element method, the finite cell method, the Cartesian grid method, the immersed interface method, the virtual boundary method, the embedded boundary method, etc; e.g., see [44,47,6,40,41,11,16,52,36,31,29,30,28,27,15,7,5,4,35,42,10,8,9,37,26,3,46,33,45,17] and many others. The main objective of these techniques is to simplify the mesh generation for irregular domains as well as to mitigate the effect of 'bad' elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The core idea is again to immerse the original domain into a geometrically bigger and simpler one [15]. Finite difference, finite volume and low order finite element methods have been used to discretize the fictitious domain, see for example [4,14,21,25]. To treat the boundary conditions, the literature provides a wide scope of ideas and techniques similar in nature but different in names, such as Lagrange multiplier method [9] or fat boundary method [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%