2000
DOI: 10.1557/proc-616-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Parallel Detecting, Spectroscopic Ellipsometer for Intelligent Process Control of Continuously Deposited CIGS Films

Abstract: Advanced materials processing involves active control of fabrication and real-time monitoring of the final product. Sensors must be an integral part of the overall material processing system. ITN Energy Systems, Inc. and the Colorado School of Mines have developed a Parallel Detection, Spectroscopic Ellipsometer (PDSE) sensor for in-situ, real-time characterization and process control of multi-layered vapor deposited films. By measuring changes in the polarization state of reflecting light as a function of wav… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accurate measurement is verified by ex-situ comparison with scanning electron micrograph (SEM) cross-section and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS). 20,21 Moving, flexible, or softened substrates require active maintenance of sensor alignment. the atomic ratio Cu/(In+Ga)) exceeds one 13,14,15 due to the formation of Cu 2-x Se on the film surface.…”
Section: Diagnostics For the Absorber Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accurate measurement is verified by ex-situ comparison with scanning electron micrograph (SEM) cross-section and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS). 20,21 Moving, flexible, or softened substrates require active maintenance of sensor alignment. the atomic ratio Cu/(In+Ga)) exceeds one 13,14,15 due to the formation of Cu 2-x Se on the film surface.…”
Section: Diagnostics For the Absorber Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absolute temperature was determined by a thermocouple behind the Table I. Real-time monitoring methods that have been applied for fabrication of GIGS films, and their major features Method Probe Features Thermocouple 12 Temperature Composition Conductivity 27 Metal contacts Electrical properties Optical emission spectroscopy 28 Plasma or electron Source flux X-ray diffraction 29 X-ray Crystalline phases, etc. Rutherford back scattering 30 Ion beam Phases, interdiffusion Ellipsometry 31 Polarized light Composition, thickness, surface structure, bandgap, etc. X-ray fluorescence 32 X-ray Composition, thickness Pyrometer 15,16 Heat radiation Composition, thickness Laser light scattering (LLS) 17 Laser beam Composition, thickness, surface structure Spectroscopic light scattering (SLS) 18,19 White light Composition, thickness, surface structure, bandgap, etc.…”
Section: Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Slight variations in sample-to-sensor distance -or in x-ray tube currenthave little effect on interpretation and can be corrected for using the substrate signal. In contrast, techniques based on reflection (R) -including ellipsometry 17 -require precise alignment of optical source, sample, and detector. The isotropic emission also implies, however, that intensity decreases with the square of the distance to the sample, yielding a ~1/r 4 overall dependence of signal on sensor-to-sample distance, when the fall-off in intensity from the x-ray source is included.…”
Section: Comparison Of Xrf With Other In-situ Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%