2002
DOI: 10.2151/jmsj.80.99
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A One-dimensional Time Dependent Cloud Model

Abstract: A one-dimensional prognostic cloud model has been developed for possible use in a Cumulus Parameterization Scheme (CPS). In this model, the nonhydrostatic pressure, entrainment, cloud microphysics, lateral eddy mixing and vertical eddy mixing are included, and their effects are discussed.The inclusion of the nonhydrostatic pressure can (1) weaken vertical velocities, (2) help the cloud develop sooner, (3) help maintain a longer mature stage, (4) produce a stronger overshooting cooling, and (5) approximately do… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
248
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 448 publications
(249 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
248
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The surface fluxes of moisture and heat are parameterized following Monin−Obukhov similarity theory. Microphysics is simulated using the Purdue−Lin bulk scheme (34), which has six species: water vapor, cloud water, cloud ice, rain, snow, and graupel. Radiative fluxes are determined interactively using the National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Atmosphere Model version 3.0 scheme for shortwave and longwave radiation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface fluxes of moisture and heat are parameterized following Monin−Obukhov similarity theory. Microphysics is simulated using the Purdue−Lin bulk scheme (34), which has six species: water vapor, cloud water, cloud ice, rain, snow, and graupel. Radiative fluxes are determined interactively using the National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Atmosphere Model version 3.0 scheme for shortwave and longwave radiation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these tests and previous work, the physical options chosen in this study include the Mellor-YamadaJanjic planetary boundary-layer scheme (Mellor and Yamada 1982;Janjic 1990Janjic , 1996Janjic , 2002, the MoninObukhov Janjic surface-layer scheme (Monin and Obukhov 1954;Janjic 1994Janjic , 1996Janjic , 2002, the new Kain-Fritsch cumulus scheme Fritsch 1990, 1993), and the Purdue Lin microphysics scheme (Lin et al 1983;Rutledge Tao et al 1989;Chen and Sun 2002). Longwave radiation is calculated by the RRTM scheme (Mlawer et al 1997), and shortwave is represented by the Dudhia (1989) scheme.…”
Section: Methodology For Generating Confident Future Climate Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the differences in the land surface model, all simulations employed the same set of atmospheric physics schemes stemming from the WRF model. These include the Purdue scheme for microphysics (Chen and Sun, 2002), the Rapid Radiative Transfer Model for long wave radiation (Mlawer et al, 1997), the Dudhia scheme for shortwave radiation (Dudhia, 1989), the Monin-Obukhov similarity scheme for surface layer physics of nonvegetated surfaces and the ocean, and the MRF scheme for the planetary boundary layer (Hong and Pan, 1996). WRF runs at a 60-second time step, while the radiation scheme and the land surface schemes are called every 30 minutes.…”
Section: Model Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%