1981
DOI: 10.1088/0029-5515/21/5/004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A numerical study of high-beta stellarator equilibria

Abstract: A numerical study of surface- and diffuse-current, high-beta stellarator equilibria is described. Numerical results are obtained from an algorithm for the solution of the ideal magnetohydrodynamic equations in three dimensions as an initial- and boundary-value problem. Equilibria are obtained for diffuse-current plasmas just as for surface-current plasmas. The equilibrium conditions for diffuse-current plasmas are quantitatively different from those for surface-current plasmas, especially at high beta for ℓ = … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1982
1982
1985
1985

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In experiments, the current and pressure have diffuse radial profiles, and a difficult theoretical problem is to describe the intrinsically three-dimensional equilibrium. New methods were developed for solving the ideal magnetohydrodynamic equations in three dimensions as an initial-and boundary-value problem [39,40]. The results improved the quantitative agreement between theory and experiment and provided an important method for understanding many of the subtleties associated with stellarator fields.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In experiments, the current and pressure have diffuse radial profiles, and a difficult theoretical problem is to describe the intrinsically three-dimensional equilibrium. New methods were developed for solving the ideal magnetohydrodynamic equations in three dimensions as an initial-and boundary-value problem [39,40]. The results improved the quantitative agreement between theory and experiment and provided an important method for understanding many of the subtleties associated with stellarator fields.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 95%