1983
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/203.3.811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A numerical method for the study of the gravothermal instability in star clusters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The idea of this model goes back to Hachisu et al (1978) and Lynden‐Bell & Eggleton (1980), who first proposed to treat the two‐body relaxation as a transport process as in a conducting plasma. They had been developed further by Bettwieser (1983), Bettwieser & Sugimoto (1984), Heggie (1984) and Heggie & Ramamani (1989). Their present form, published in Louis & Spurzem (1991), Giersz & Spurzem (1994) and Spurzem & Takahashi (1995) improves the detailed form of the conductivities in order to yield high accuracy (for comparison with N ‐body) and correct multimass models.…”
Section: Loss‐cone Accretion On To Massive Bhs: the Diffusion Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The idea of this model goes back to Hachisu et al (1978) and Lynden‐Bell & Eggleton (1980), who first proposed to treat the two‐body relaxation as a transport process as in a conducting plasma. They had been developed further by Bettwieser (1983), Bettwieser & Sugimoto (1984), Heggie (1984) and Heggie & Ramamani (1989). Their present form, published in Louis & Spurzem (1991), Giersz & Spurzem (1994) and Spurzem & Takahashi (1995) improves the detailed form of the conductivities in order to yield high accuracy (for comparison with N ‐body) and correct multimass models.…”
Section: Loss‐cone Accretion On To Massive Bhs: the Diffusion Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first case, stars on nearly circular orbits lose energy by distant gravitational encounters with other stars and, in the process, their orbits get closer and closer to the central BH. The associated energy diffusion time‐scale can be identified with the local stellar‐dynamical relaxation time generalized for anisotropy as in Bettwieser (1983): Here σ r and σ t are, respectively, the radial and tangential velocity dispersions (in the case of isotropy 2σ 2 r =σ 2 t ), ρ ⋆ ( r ) is the mean stellar mass density, N is the total particle number, G is the gravitational constant, m ⋆ is the individual stellar mass and is the Coulomb logarithm. We set γ= 0.11 (Giersz & Heggie 1994).…”
Section: Loss‐cone Accretion On To Massive Bhs: the Diffusion Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In real star clusters, this "catastrophe" is averted by the second process that governs star cluster evolution, namely short-range strong stellar encounters between individual stars and binaries (and higher-order stellar systems). Early star cluster simulations showed that including the effect of binaries as an energy source (and even a single massive binary) can allow the core to rebound out of this collapsing phase [8]. These models also predict a new phase of gravothermal oscillations, where the core bounces between collapsing and expanding due to the interplay between the diffusion of energy out of the core, due to two-body relaxation processes, and the input of energy to the core, from close encounters with binary stars.…”
Section: Dynamical Processing Of Stars and Planets Through Star Clustersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More than 35 yr ago, Hachisu et al (1978) and Lynden‐Bell & Eggleton (1980) proposed transport process in a self‐gravitating, conducting gas sphere as a way to mimic two‐body stellar relaxation. Later, Bettwieser (1983), Bettwieser & Sugimoto (1984), Bettwieser & Spurzem (1986), Heggie (1984), Heggie & Ramamani (1989) and Louis & Spurzem (1991) implemented anisotropy and Giersz & Spurzem (1994) and Spurzem & Takahashi (1995) added a multi‐mass distribution and improved the detailed form of the conductivities to have better accuracy. The resulting model is often called the AGM.…”
Section: Self‐gravitating Conducting Gas Spheresmentioning
confidence: 99%