2015
DOI: 10.1007/s12221-015-5662-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A numerical investigation into the influence of layer space on panel ballistic performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cunniff [6] reported that material near the striking face has little influence on ballistic performance of an armour panel when the impact velocity is much higher than the ballistic limit. Chen [5] [9] explained that the front layers of fabric in a multilayer panel are more likely to be broken in shear, and the back layers of fabric tend to fail in tension. As a result, energy absorption of each layer is increased from front to back in the panel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cunniff [6] reported that material near the striking face has little influence on ballistic performance of an armour panel when the impact velocity is much higher than the ballistic limit. Chen [5] [9] explained that the front layers of fabric in a multilayer panel are more likely to be broken in shear, and the back layers of fabric tend to fail in tension. As a result, energy absorption of each layer is increased from front to back in the panel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They determined that aramid has lower ultimate strain and higher value of hardness than UHMWPE. Thus, the behavior of UHMWPE composites under high velocity impact have received considerable attention in scientific literature [ 9 , 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple layers also afford a method of mitigating ballistic impact through management of the shock wave (e.g., deflection and spreading) [26,27,28]. For these reasons, the stacking sequence can exert a significant influence on performance [29,30,31,32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%