2017
DOI: 10.1002/nme.5547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A numerical convergence study regarding homogenization assumptions in phase field modeling

Abstract: From a mathematical point of view, phase field theory can be understood as a smooth approximation of an underlying sharp interface problem. However, the smooth phase field approximation is not uniquely defined. Different phase field approximations are known to converge to the same sharp interface problem in the limiting case-if the thickness of the diffuse interface converges to zero. In this respect and focusing on numerics, a question that naturally arises is as follows: What are the convergence rates of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second kind of models considers all jump conditions in the stresses and strains across the interface and contains the Reuss and Voigt type homogenization methods as limiting cases . It has been shown that the quality of the solution and the rate of convergence to the sharp interface solution depend on the chosen homogenization methods and that the homogenization method of the second kind outperforms the other ones . For that reason, in the presented contribution a homogenization method is derived that fulfills the kinematic compatibility across the interface and static equilibrium at the interface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second kind of models considers all jump conditions in the stresses and strains across the interface and contains the Reuss and Voigt type homogenization methods as limiting cases . It has been shown that the quality of the solution and the rate of convergence to the sharp interface solution depend on the chosen homogenization methods and that the homogenization method of the second kind outperforms the other ones . For that reason, in the presented contribution a homogenization method is derived that fulfills the kinematic compatibility across the interface and static equilibrium at the interface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, better approaches exist, which account for the stress and strain discontinuity across the interface simultaneously [17,21,22,23]. The improvement manifests itself in better convergence rates and the fact, that the kinematics of an energy driven, moving interface are captured correctly [24]. The improved homogenization scheme is often referred to as partial rank-I relaxation, which will become apparent in the remainder of the paper, and yields a pointwise fulfillment of the equilibrium and compatibility within the diffuse region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain the mechanical energy and the mechanical driving force, a homogenization scheme is applied to calculate the individual phase-field strain distribution, which is presented in [53][54][55] and applied to OpenPhase in [56]. Therefore, a partial rank-one homogenization is used, which satisfies the static equilibrium and the strains compatibility condition at the interfaces.…”
Section: Homogenization Of Eigenstrains On Microscalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…cf. [54], where n is the normal vector of the interface and a characterizes the jump of the displacement gradient All other parameters are explained in Table 4. The effective (homogenized) eigenstrain tensor representing the internal laminate structure of one martensite grain can be computed by volume averaging, whereas the laminate consists of equal amounts of the two variants.…”
Section: Homogenization Of Eigenstrains On Microscalementioning
confidence: 99%