2017
DOI: 10.1137/16m1100010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Variable-Separation Method Based on Sparse and Low Rank Representation for Stochastic Partial Differential Equations

Abstract: In this paper, we propose a novel variable-separation (NVS) method for generic multivariate functions. The idea of NVS is extended to to obtain the solution in tensor product structure for stochastic partial differential equations (SPDEs). Compared with many widely used variation-separation methods, NVS shares their merits but has less computation complexity and better efficiency. NVS can be used to get the separated representation of the solution for SPDE in a systematic enrichment manner. No iteration is per… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where p ( ) and f q ( ) are stochastic functions with respect to , a p ∶ × −→ R is a symmetric bilinear form, and b q ∶ −→ R is continuous functional; they are independent of . If (x; ) and f(x, t; ) are not affine with respect to , the empirical interpolation method 41,42 can be used, and the NVS method 25 can also be used to obtain their affine forms.…”
Section: Nvs Methods For Time-dependent Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…where p ( ) and f q ( ) are stochastic functions with respect to , a p ∶ × −→ R is a symmetric bilinear form, and b q ∶ −→ R is continuous functional; they are independent of . If (x; ) and f(x, t; ) are not affine with respect to , the empirical interpolation method 41,42 can be used, and the NVS method 25 can also be used to obtain their affine forms.…”
Section: Nvs Methods For Time-dependent Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inner product (·,·; ξ ) is defined as (w,v;ξ)=(w(ξ),v(ξ))L2(𝒪). We assume that the coefficient κ ( x ; ξ ) and the source term f ( x , t ; ξ ) have the variable‐separated form and that the bilinear form a (·,·; ξ ) and the associated linear form b (·; t , ξ ) are affine with respect to ξ , ie, {arraya(w,v;ξ)=p=1maκp(ξ)ap(w,v),v,wV,ξΩ,arrayb(v;t,ξ)=q=1mbfq(ξ)bq(v;t),vV,ξΩ, where κ p ( ξ ) and f q ( ξ ) are stochastic functions with respect to ξ , ap:𝒱×𝒱double-struckR is a symmetric bilinear form, and bq:𝒱double-struckR is continuous functional; they are independent of ξ . If κ ( x ; ξ ) and f ( x , t ; ξ ) are not affine with respect to ξ , the empirical interpolation method can be used, and the NVS method can also be used to obtain their affine forms.…”
Section: Proposed Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As noted before, exploration of the posterior distribution requires repeated evaluations of the forward operator, and a large number of samples are needed to ensure reliable estimates of the inference. One attempts at accelerating Bayesian inference in computationally intensive inverse problems have relied on reduction of the stochastic forward model [2], the approaches of building stochastic surrogates include generalized polynomial chaos (gPC)-based stochastic method [38,26,43,39,20], Gaussian process [33,3] or projection-type reduced order models [18,28,29,23], for multiple solutions, proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) [18] reduced-order model is incorporated into the ensemble-based method [21] to significantly reduce the costs [17], etc. Large numbers of forward model simulations are required for these methods, especially when the dimension of stochastic parameter is high.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%