2002
DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00394.2001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel ultrasound technique to study the biomechanics of the human esophagus in vivo

Abstract: The objectives of this study were to validate a novel ultrasound technique and to use it to study the circumferential stress-strain properties of the human esophagus in vivo. A manometric catheter equipped with a high-compliance bag and a high-frequency intraluminal ultrasonography probe was used to record esophageal pressure and images. Validation studies were performed in vitro followed by in vivo studies in healthy human subjects. Esophageal distensions were performed with either an isovolumic (5-20 ml of w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
41
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(27 reference statements)
1
41
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Such differences in tissue stiffness could have teleological advantages for bolus propulsion, in that more rapid clearance would be expected in the proximal (less distensible) segment of the esophagus and slower clearance would be expected in the distal (more distensible) segment of the esophagus. Previous computational (Nicosia and Brasseur 2002;Pal and Brasseur 2002) and experimental (Yang et al 2004;Fan et al 2002;Takeda et al 2002;Nicosia et al 2001) analyses of esophageal wall mechanics have focused on the relationship between applied stress and tissue distensibility (strain) and have generally assumed an explicitly orthogonal relationship between the outer and inner musculature. The generalization of our findings throughout Mammalia may allow a broad reconsideration of the way in which intraluminal mechanical Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such differences in tissue stiffness could have teleological advantages for bolus propulsion, in that more rapid clearance would be expected in the proximal (less distensible) segment of the esophagus and slower clearance would be expected in the distal (more distensible) segment of the esophagus. Previous computational (Nicosia and Brasseur 2002;Pal and Brasseur 2002) and experimental (Yang et al 2004;Fan et al 2002;Takeda et al 2002;Nicosia et al 2001) analyses of esophageal wall mechanics have focused on the relationship between applied stress and tissue distensibility (strain) and have generally assumed an explicitly orthogonal relationship between the outer and inner musculature. The generalization of our findings throughout Mammalia may allow a broad reconsideration of the way in which intraluminal mechanical Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, ultrasound combined with manometry or impedance planimetry was used to study the biomechanical wall properties as well as the motility of human esophagus [20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. It was demonstrated that the stress-strain relationship of esophageal wall revealed a linear shape.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was demonstrated that the stress-strain relationship of esophageal wall revealed a linear shape. The active component (muscle contraction) was different during isovolumic and isobaric distensions, but the passive components (after atropine) were similar [24,25]. However, it seems difficult to obtain more accurate stress-strain relation data in vivo because the esophageal wall connected to the surrounding organs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Morphometric and mechanical properties of gastrointestinal tissues are frequently studied in rat (Duch et al, 1996;Gao and Gregersen, 2000;Jorgensen et al, 2001a;Zhao et al, 2002;Dou et al, 2003;Smith et al, 2005) or in guinea pig (Storkholm et al, 1995;Gregersen et al, 1998;Jorgensen et al, 2001b;Liao et al, 2010). Biomechanical characteristics of human gastrointestinal tract were assessed using ultrasound Palmeri et al, 2005;Takeda et al, 2002) and magnetic resonance (Frokjaer et al, 2005;Frokjaer et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%