2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-3013-2_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Robust Watermarking Algorithm for Encrypted Medical Image Based on Bandelet-DCT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The testing of the system suggests that the methodology used can differentiate the liver as having no damage, minimal damage, significant damage, severe damage, and cirrhosis. Additionally, the most widely used approach in this disease diagnosis is image processing [63][64][65][66]. But, this approach fails to detect it until or unless any physical symptoms have appeared in the liver.…”
Section: Defuzzifiermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The testing of the system suggests that the methodology used can differentiate the liver as having no damage, minimal damage, significant damage, severe damage, and cirrhosis. Additionally, the most widely used approach in this disease diagnosis is image processing [63][64][65][66]. But, this approach fails to detect it until or unless any physical symptoms have appeared in the liver.…”
Section: Defuzzifiermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fang et al [ 51 ] illustrated a new encryption algorithm to secure the host medical image to protect private information; the author’s algorithm is based on Bandelet Transform and Discrete Cosine Transform. The medical image is first encrypted using a Logistic chaotic map, and then the features are extracted using Bandelet Transform.…”
Section: Cryptographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When a convolutional neural network (CNN) is used to extract the rain trace information, it is easy to accidentally extract and remove the background information. It is worth to mention that although generative adversarial networks (GANs) can reconstruct a more realistic image after rain removal [9,10], performance evaluation reveals that their performance is actually worse than the CNN-based reconstruction method. It can be inferred that many of the detail textures reconstructed by GANs are false and unreal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%