2021
DOI: 10.1111/mmi.14778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel receptor for platelet‐activating factor and lysophosphatidylcholine in Trypanosoma cruzi

Abstract: The lipid mediators, platelet‐activating factor (PAF) and lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC), play relevant pathophysiological roles in Trypanosoma cruzi infection. Several species of LPC, including C18:1 LPC, which mimics the effects of PAF, are synthesized by T. cruzi. The present study identified a receptor in T. cruzi, which was predicted to bind to PAF, and found it to be homologous to members of the progestin and adiponectin family of receptors (PAQRs). We constructed a three‐dimensional model of the T. cruzi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Lastly, there has been a debate about whether all effects of PAF described in various cells, tissues and organs described above are mediated via its cell‐membrane‐bound receptors and on the relative roles of cell‐surface and nuclear‐membrane‐bound PAF receptors 127–129 . Based on the schematic in Figure 3, it would appear that both sets of receptors are involved in many if not all physiological and pathological actions of PAF.…”
Section: Cell‐membrane Vs Nuclear Paf Receptors and Receptor‐independ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lastly, there has been a debate about whether all effects of PAF described in various cells, tissues and organs described above are mediated via its cell‐membrane‐bound receptors and on the relative roles of cell‐surface and nuclear‐membrane‐bound PAF receptors 127–129 . Based on the schematic in Figure 3, it would appear that both sets of receptors are involved in many if not all physiological and pathological actions of PAF.…”
Section: Cell‐membrane Vs Nuclear Paf Receptors and Receptor‐independ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, there has been a debate about whether all effects of PAF described in various cells, tissues and organs described above are mediated via its cell‐membrane‐bound receptors and on the relative roles of cell‐surface and nuclear‐membrane‐bound PAF receptors. 127 , 128 , 129 Based on the schematic in Figure 3 , it would appear that both sets of receptors are involved in many if not all physiological and pathological actions of PAF. It could be that the acute transmitter/mediator and physiological effects recruit only the outer cell‐membrane‐bound PAF receptors, whereas the nuclear receptors are involved in chronic and pathological conditions but also require the cell‐membrane‐bound PAF receptors.…”
Section: Cell‐membrane Vs Nuclear Paf Receptors and Receptor‐independ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Os grupos que contribuem nos processos de infecção são os grupos OG0000115 e OG0000116. O primeiro é composto por proteínas homólogas à família de receptores de progestina e adiponectina (PAQRs: the progestin and adiponectin family of receptors) que em T. cruzi há evidências da sua funcionalidade e que desencadeia a diferenciação celular, contribuindo para o processo de infecção a macrófagos (Coelho et al 2021). O segundo grupo é formado por proteínas ecotin-like, um inibidor de serina protease, considerado em diversos patógenos como fator de virulência, incluindo nos gêneros Trypanosoma e Leishmania, embora não totalmente esclarecido.…”
Section: Confusumunclassified