2021
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-8426-2.ch001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Pythogorean Fuzzy-SWARA-CRITIC-COPRAS Method for Evaluating the Barriers to Developing Business Model Innovation for Sustainability

Abstract: The present study proposes a novel integrated SWARA-CRITIC-COPRAS under the Pythagorean fuzzy (PF) environment to evaluate the barriers to developing the sustainable business model innovation (SBMI). To this end, the barriers were identified through the literature review and evaluated by three decision experts using linguistic variables. The PF-SWARA and the PF-CRITIC method were applied to calculate the weight of the subjective and objective barriers, and the PF-COPRAS was applied to evaluate alternatives con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We let Z=false[zijfalse]m×n $Z={[{z}_{{ij}}]}_{m\times n}$ be the aggregated decision matrix; thus: Z=PFWAϖ=1k=1l1μijkϖj,k=1lηijkϖj,k=1lηijk+υijkϖjk=1lηijkϖj, for i=1,,nnormal; j=1,,m. $Z=PFW{A}_{\varpi }=\left(1-{\prod }_{k=1}^{l}{\left(1-{\mu }_{ij}^{k}\right)}^{{\varpi }_{j}},{\prod }_{k=1}^{l}{\left({\eta }_{ij}^{k}\right)}^{{\varpi }_{j}},{\prod }_{k=1}^{l}{\left({\eta }_{ij}^{k}+{\upsilon }_{ij}^{k}\right)}^{{\varpi }_{j}}-{\prod }_{k=1}^{l}{\left({\eta }_{ij}^{k}\right)}^{{\varpi }_{j}}\right),\unicode{x02007}\mathrm{for}\unicode{x02007}i=1,\text{\unicode{x02026}},n{\rm{;}}\unicode{x02007}j=1,\text{\unicode{x02026}},m.$ Step 5. (Saraji et al, 2022) Calculating the weights of challenges (SWARA) 5.1 Calculating the crisp value using Equation () 5.2 Challenges are ranked from the most to the least significant with regard to DE preferences (Saraji et al, 2021). 5.3 The significance of each challenge is compared to the first preferred challenge. 5.4 Calculating the comparative coefficient ( k j ) using Equation ().…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We let Z=false[zijfalse]m×n $Z={[{z}_{{ij}}]}_{m\times n}$ be the aggregated decision matrix; thus: Z=PFWAϖ=1k=1l1μijkϖj,k=1lηijkϖj,k=1lηijk+υijkϖjk=1lηijkϖj, for i=1,,nnormal; j=1,,m. $Z=PFW{A}_{\varpi }=\left(1-{\prod }_{k=1}^{l}{\left(1-{\mu }_{ij}^{k}\right)}^{{\varpi }_{j}},{\prod }_{k=1}^{l}{\left({\eta }_{ij}^{k}\right)}^{{\varpi }_{j}},{\prod }_{k=1}^{l}{\left({\eta }_{ij}^{k}+{\upsilon }_{ij}^{k}\right)}^{{\varpi }_{j}}-{\prod }_{k=1}^{l}{\left({\eta }_{ij}^{k}\right)}^{{\varpi }_{j}}\right),\unicode{x02007}\mathrm{for}\unicode{x02007}i=1,\text{\unicode{x02026}},n{\rm{;}}\unicode{x02007}j=1,\text{\unicode{x02026}},m.$ Step 5. (Saraji et al, 2022) Calculating the weights of challenges (SWARA) 5.1 Calculating the crisp value using Equation () 5.2 Challenges are ranked from the most to the least significant with regard to DE preferences (Saraji et al, 2021). 5.3 The significance of each challenge is compared to the first preferred challenge. 5.4 Calculating the comparative coefficient ( k j ) using Equation ().…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Step 5. (Saraji et al, 2022) Calculating the weights of challenges (SWARA) 5.1 Calculating the crisp value using Equation () 5.2 Challenges are ranked from the most to the least significant with regard to DE preferences (Saraji et al, 2021). 5.3 The significance of each challenge is compared to the first preferred challenge. 5.4 Calculating the comparative coefficient ( k j ) using Equation ().…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since it is a relatively new method, studies on Pythagorean fuzzy CRITIC (PF-CRITIC) are also very limited. There are several published papers in the literature regarding the PF-CRITIC, such as assessment of 5G mobile communication technology [47], agriculture crop selection [49], developing business model innovation for sustainability [50], cybersecurity framework prioritization for healthcare organizations [51], supplier selection [52], evaluate the barriers of blockchain technology adoption in sustainable supply chain management [53], cache replacement policy selection in fog computing [54].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%