2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2012.09.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel probabilistic approach to assess the blade throw hazard of wind turbines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since their report, there has been a renewed interest in modeling risk, with several authors reporting on analysis of that risk. [5][6][7][8] The state-of-the-art modeling approach is 6 degrees-of-freedom motion of the blade fragments with aerodynamic loading. Simplified models do not match the results of the 6 degrees-of-freedom models; Sørensen 9 showed that drag ballistics do not capture the downwind distance and the range for vacuum ballistics is too far.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since their report, there has been a renewed interest in modeling risk, with several authors reporting on analysis of that risk. [5][6][7][8] The state-of-the-art modeling approach is 6 degrees-of-freedom motion of the blade fragments with aerodynamic loading. Simplified models do not match the results of the 6 degrees-of-freedom models; Sørensen 9 showed that drag ballistics do not capture the downwind distance and the range for vacuum ballistics is too far.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carbone and Afferrante [59] explained the necessity of developing methodologies to assess risk in the areas surrounding the wind farm and presented a probabilistic method to estimate the blade throw hazard of wind turbines.…”
Section: Existing Approaches Of Risk Assessment In Wind Turbinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…used a simple approach to analyze possible setbacks based only on the lateral throw distance of fragments, although this methodology did not rigorously calculate the risk to a particular spatial area. More advanced approaches, for instance those in Carbone and Afferrante (2013), Larwood and van Dam (2015), and Morgan et al (1998), use the results of Monte Carlo simulation to estimate the risk imposed to a particular spatial area on the ground at a certain setback distance from the turbine. Carbone and Afferrante (2013) propose an approach in which a simulation model is used to estimate a probability density function (PDF) describing the probability of fragment impact over the ground.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%