2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2015.01.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel platform sensing based on combination of electromembrane-assisted solid phase microextraction with linear sweep voltammetry for the determination of tramadol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most probably, this was due to possible competitive extraction and pH shift in the EME acceptor phase. 28,29,36,37 Based on the results, we concluded that 15 min was the optimal extraction time to provide a clear group separation and high recovery, but longer time was needed if higher recoveries are preferable.…”
Section: Optimization Of Major Operational Parameters In a Series Ofmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Most probably, this was due to possible competitive extraction and pH shift in the EME acceptor phase. 28,29,36,37 Based on the results, we concluded that 15 min was the optimal extraction time to provide a clear group separation and high recovery, but longer time was needed if higher recoveries are preferable.…”
Section: Optimization Of Major Operational Parameters In a Series Ofmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A literature survey revealed that several methods have been reported for the determination of TRM either alone or in the presence of other co‐formulated materials. These include spectrophotometric (Abdellatef, ; Amin, Adawy, Ali, & El‐Shahatt, ; Dhumal, Bhusari, Ghante, & Jain, ; Glavanović, Glavanović, & Tomišić, ; Lakshmi, Ravisankar, Kumar, & Babu, ; Thomas & Sankar, ), spectrofluorimetric (Abdellatef, El‐Henawee, El‐Sayed, & Ayad, ; Smith, Manavalan, Kannan, & Rajendiran, ), chromatographic (Baconi, Stan, Abdul Jalil Ebrahim, Tuchila, & Balalau, ; Batool, Ahmed, & Rasheed, ; Desai, Captain, & Kamdar, ; Dhumal, Bhusari, Patra, Thareja, & Jain, ; Karunakaran, Navaneethan, & Elango, ; Kiarostami, Rouini, Mohammadian, Lavasani, & Ghazaghi, ; Ravisankar, Sridevi, & Kumari, ; Solomon, Anand, Shukla, Sivakumar, & Venkatnarayanan, ), electrochemical (Chitravathi & Munichandraiah, ; Deiminiat, Rounaghi, & Arbab‐Zavar, ; Fakhari, Sahragard, Ahmar, & Tabani, ; Ganjali, Razavi, Faridbod, Riahi, & Norouzi, ; Madrakian, Alizadeh, Bahram, & Afkhami, ) and electrophoresis (Cunha, Ribeiro, Muñoz, & Richter, ) methods in addition to the hyphenated methods where the chromatographic separations are coupled with the detection (El‐Sayed, Mohamed, Nasser, Button, & Holt, ; Haage, Kronstrand, Carlsson, Kugelberg, & Josefsson, ; Liu, Wang, Yu, Dong, & Yue, ; Tambe, Deodhar, & Prakya, ; Tanaka, Naito, Mino, & Kawakami, ; Yilmaz & Erdem, ). Thus, the aim of the present study was to develop a highly sensitive, rapid and accurate LC–MS/MS method for simultaneous quantitation of TRM and some expected co‐formulated compounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the above‐mentioned analytic methods, electrochemical techniques show the advantages of simplicity, cost effectiveness, easy operation, low analysis time and acceptable sensitivity . On the other hand, electrochemical detection is a powerful alternative of other analytical techniques for monitoring the organic pollutants such as nitroaromatics .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%