1998
DOI: 10.1037/1064-1297.6.1.22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel paradigm to investigate regulation of drug intake in rats self-administering cocaine or heroin intravenously.

Abstract: The purpose of this experiment was to investigate the regulation of drug intake in rats (n = 20) self-administering heroin or cocaine during daily 5-hr sessions. Operant chambers were equipped with 2 levers and associated stimulus lights. A response on the lever with stimuli signaling an increase in dose size increased the infusion duration by 3 s, and a response on the lever with stimuli signaling a decrease in dose size decreased the infusion duration by 3 s. Results showed that daily and hourly drug intake … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
53
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
53
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2A). Although at first this may be surprising given reports in the literature of well trained animals' ability to regulate intake when cocaine dose is varied (Pickens and Thompson, 1968;Gerber and Wise, 1989;Lynch et al, 1998;Panlilio et al, 2003), our animals received minimal training before the switch in cocaine dose. Furthermore, there are now many paradigms that model an escalation of consumption, and they all demonstrate conditions that produce instability of intake (i.e., escalation) (Carroll et al, 1989;Fitch and Roberts, 1993;Ahmed and Koob, 1998;Tornatzky and Miczek, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…2A). Although at first this may be surprising given reports in the literature of well trained animals' ability to regulate intake when cocaine dose is varied (Pickens and Thompson, 1968;Gerber and Wise, 1989;Lynch et al, 1998;Panlilio et al, 2003), our animals received minimal training before the switch in cocaine dose. Furthermore, there are now many paradigms that model an escalation of consumption, and they all demonstrate conditions that produce instability of intake (i.e., escalation) (Carroll et al, 1989;Fitch and Roberts, 1993;Ahmed and Koob, 1998;Tornatzky and Miczek, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Animals typically self-administer drugs at regularly spaced intervals under FR1 schedules (Yokel and Pickens, 1974;Dougherty and Pickens, 1976;Pickens et al, 1981;Wise et al, 1995a, b;Lynch et al, 1998). However, under certain conditions (eg exposure to prolonged periods of drug availability), this pattern of intake may be dysregulated, leading to an escalation of drug use (Ahmed et al, 2000;Ahmed and Koob, 1998;Bozarth and Wise, 1985;Tornatzky and Miczek, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These procedures have shown that the reinforcing effects of cocaine can be described by an ascending dose-response curve. The peak of the progressive ratio dose-response curve is typically in the range of 1.5 mg/ kg (for review, see Arnold and Roberts, 1997;Stafford et al, 1998), and studies offering a choice between different doses of cocaine (Johanson and Schuster, 1975;Llewellyn et al, 1976;Lynch et al, 1998;Ward et al, 2005) have shown that larger doses on the ascending limb are generally preferred.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%