2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.aej.2022.10.069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel Multi-Level feature selection method for radiomics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LASSO exactly does this by shrinking the near zero coefficients to zero. However, LASSO does not consider features that are weakly correlated ( 31 ). Ridge regression on the other hand addresses this problem by not forcing the near zero coefficients to zero but penalizes the loss function by adding quadratic terms of coefficient values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LASSO exactly does this by shrinking the near zero coefficients to zero. However, LASSO does not consider features that are weakly correlated ( 31 ). Ridge regression on the other hand addresses this problem by not forcing the near zero coefficients to zero but penalizes the loss function by adding quadratic terms of coefficient values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, it appears that in the presence of a high noise-to-signal ratio, conventional feature selection techniques outperform methods that are based on machine learning models. Future studies would benefit from evaluating alternative approaches, such as Coe-Thr-Lasso method, that facilitate a more holistic analysis of variable importance 47 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, it appears that in the presence of a high noise-to-signal ratio, conventional feature selection techniques outperform methods that are based on machine learning models. Future studies would bene t from evaluating alternative approaches, such as Coe-Thr-Lasso method, that facilitate a more holistic analysis of variable importance 43 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%